{"title":"并行设计环境下的冲突处理","authors":"M. Kim","doi":"10.1145/945541.945544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In concurrent design the design teams participating in a project have different perspectives, and those differences lead to conflicting decisions. The resolution model, mediator, proposed in this work provides system-mediated resolution to optimize the design process in general. This paper introduces the core concept of the mediator, which produces a resolution network from a given constraint network and determines the most optimistic resolution in terms of satisfying overall constraints based on rational reasoning.","PeriodicalId":390207,"journal":{"name":"ACM Siggroup Bulletin","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coping with conflict in concurrent design environment\",\"authors\":\"M. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/945541.945544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In concurrent design the design teams participating in a project have different perspectives, and those differences lead to conflicting decisions. The resolution model, mediator, proposed in this work provides system-mediated resolution to optimize the design process in general. This paper introduces the core concept of the mediator, which produces a resolution network from a given constraint network and determines the most optimistic resolution in terms of satisfying overall constraints based on rational reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Siggroup Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Siggroup Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/945541.945544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Siggroup Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/945541.945544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coping with conflict in concurrent design environment
In concurrent design the design teams participating in a project have different perspectives, and those differences lead to conflicting decisions. The resolution model, mediator, proposed in this work provides system-mediated resolution to optimize the design process in general. This paper introduces the core concept of the mediator, which produces a resolution network from a given constraint network and determines the most optimistic resolution in terms of satisfying overall constraints based on rational reasoning.