解决欧洲基础设施需求:欧洲战略投资基金

Noel Gregor Paterson-Jones
{"title":"解决欧洲基础设施需求:欧洲战略投资基金","authors":"Noel Gregor Paterson-Jones","doi":"10.1080/24724718.2019.1594567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper focuses on Europe's response to the slow pace of recovery following the 2008 economic crisis. There was a 15% decline in investment in key economic sectors, including strategic infrastructure. Potentially good but higher risk projects were struggling to find investment. Money was available in the system, but economic uncertainty was stopping investors from taking risk. To address this market failure, the European Union (EU) developed an Investment Plan for Europe (IPE), popularly referred to as the Juncker Plan.1 The IPE comprises a three-pronged strategy the key pillar of which is the establishment of a guarantee fund, the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI). EFSI is designed to overcome the perceived market failure by mitigating project risk and mobilising private investment to address market gaps.2 It is a simple but powerful financial instrument that seeks to put investment capital back to work and exploit the opportunity to address Europe's infrastructure needs while borrowing costs are low and liquidity relatively plentiful for eligible projects. The paper discusses the theory behind the policy, how it contributes to delivery of the EU's commitment to sustainable development as embodied in its 2020 Strategy, and whether it is supported by academic economic consensus.","PeriodicalId":143411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tackling Europe’s infrastructure needs: the European Fund for Strategic Investments\",\"authors\":\"Noel Gregor Paterson-Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24724718.2019.1594567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper focuses on Europe's response to the slow pace of recovery following the 2008 economic crisis. There was a 15% decline in investment in key economic sectors, including strategic infrastructure. Potentially good but higher risk projects were struggling to find investment. Money was available in the system, but economic uncertainty was stopping investors from taking risk. To address this market failure, the European Union (EU) developed an Investment Plan for Europe (IPE), popularly referred to as the Juncker Plan.1 The IPE comprises a three-pronged strategy the key pillar of which is the establishment of a guarantee fund, the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI). EFSI is designed to overcome the perceived market failure by mitigating project risk and mobilising private investment to address market gaps.2 It is a simple but powerful financial instrument that seeks to put investment capital back to work and exploit the opportunity to address Europe's infrastructure needs while borrowing costs are low and liquidity relatively plentiful for eligible projects. The paper discusses the theory behind the policy, how it contributes to delivery of the EU's commitment to sustainable development as embodied in its 2020 Strategy, and whether it is supported by academic economic consensus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24724718.2019.1594567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24724718.2019.1594567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文关注的是2008年经济危机后欧洲对缓慢复苏的反应。包括战略性基础设施在内的关键经济部门的投资下降了15%。潜在的好项目但风险较高,难以找到投资。资金在金融体系中是可用的,但经济的不确定性阻止了投资者承担风险。为了解决这一市场失灵问题,欧盟(EU)制定了欧洲投资计划(IPE),通常被称为容克计划(Juncker Plan)。该计划包括一个三管齐下的战略,其中关键支柱是建立一个担保基金,即欧洲战略投资基金(EFSI)。EFSI旨在通过减轻项目风险和调动私人投资来解决市场缺口,从而克服市场失灵它是一种简单但功能强大的金融工具,旨在让投资资本重新发挥作用,并利用这个机会,在借款成本较低、符合条件的项目流动性相对充足的情况下,满足欧洲的基础设施需求。本文讨论了该政策背后的理论,它如何有助于实现欧盟在其2020战略中体现的可持续发展承诺,以及它是否得到学术经济共识的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tackling Europe’s infrastructure needs: the European Fund for Strategic Investments
Abstract This paper focuses on Europe's response to the slow pace of recovery following the 2008 economic crisis. There was a 15% decline in investment in key economic sectors, including strategic infrastructure. Potentially good but higher risk projects were struggling to find investment. Money was available in the system, but economic uncertainty was stopping investors from taking risk. To address this market failure, the European Union (EU) developed an Investment Plan for Europe (IPE), popularly referred to as the Juncker Plan.1 The IPE comprises a three-pronged strategy the key pillar of which is the establishment of a guarantee fund, the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI). EFSI is designed to overcome the perceived market failure by mitigating project risk and mobilising private investment to address market gaps.2 It is a simple but powerful financial instrument that seeks to put investment capital back to work and exploit the opportunity to address Europe's infrastructure needs while borrowing costs are low and liquidity relatively plentiful for eligible projects. The paper discusses the theory behind the policy, how it contributes to delivery of the EU's commitment to sustainable development as embodied in its 2020 Strategy, and whether it is supported by academic economic consensus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信