休伊特网球综合知识测验A、B表修订

J. E. Hewitt
{"title":"休伊特网球综合知识测验A、B表修订","authors":"J. E. Hewitt","doi":"10.1080/10671188.1964.10613293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hewitt's Comprehensive Tennis Knowledge Test, first reported in the Research Quarterly in 1937, has been revised. During the interim over 10,000 copies of Form A and B have been used by members of the profession. There were 200 questions in the original battery. These were reduced to 100 after each of the questions was evaluated by item analysis and Holzinger's Index of Discrimination. The difficulty rating was determined from the percentage answered correctly by three levels of tennis ability—beginners, advanced, and the varsity group. Alternate halves (odd vs. even) for the two forms A and B, when using the Spearman-Brown Prophecy formula, gave a reliability of .95. When correlated with the Minnesota Tennis Knowledge test, r = .81, and with Scott's Achievement Examinations for Elementary and Intermediate Tennis, r = .86; this would indicate sufficient validity. Scoring key and grading scale for each form is included at the end of the paper.","PeriodicalId":192960,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1964-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hewitt's Comprehensive Tennis Knowledge Test—Form A and B Revised\",\"authors\":\"J. E. Hewitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10671188.1964.10613293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Hewitt's Comprehensive Tennis Knowledge Test, first reported in the Research Quarterly in 1937, has been revised. During the interim over 10,000 copies of Form A and B have been used by members of the profession. There were 200 questions in the original battery. These were reduced to 100 after each of the questions was evaluated by item analysis and Holzinger's Index of Discrimination. The difficulty rating was determined from the percentage answered correctly by three levels of tennis ability—beginners, advanced, and the varsity group. Alternate halves (odd vs. even) for the two forms A and B, when using the Spearman-Brown Prophecy formula, gave a reliability of .95. When correlated with the Minnesota Tennis Knowledge test, r = .81, and with Scott's Achievement Examinations for Elementary and Intermediate Tennis, r = .86; this would indicate sufficient validity. Scoring key and grading scale for each form is included at the end of the paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1964-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1964.10613293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1964.10613293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

休伊特网球综合知识测验首次发表于1937年的《研究季刊》,现已进行了修订。在此期间,专业人员使用了超过10,000份表格A和表格B。原始电池中有200个问题。通过项目分析和Holzinger's Index of Discrimination对每个问题进行评估后,这些问题减少到100个。难度等级是根据三个水平的网球选手——初学者、高级选手和校队——正确回答的百分比确定的。当使用斯皮尔曼-布朗预言公式时,A和B两种形式的交替一半(奇数或偶数)的可靠性为0.95。当与明尼苏达网球知识测验相关时,r = .81,与斯科特初级和中级网球成绩测验相关时,r = .86;这将表明足够的有效性。每个表格的评分关键和评分尺度都包含在论文的最后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hewitt's Comprehensive Tennis Knowledge Test—Form A and B Revised
Abstract Hewitt's Comprehensive Tennis Knowledge Test, first reported in the Research Quarterly in 1937, has been revised. During the interim over 10,000 copies of Form A and B have been used by members of the profession. There were 200 questions in the original battery. These were reduced to 100 after each of the questions was evaluated by item analysis and Holzinger's Index of Discrimination. The difficulty rating was determined from the percentage answered correctly by three levels of tennis ability—beginners, advanced, and the varsity group. Alternate halves (odd vs. even) for the two forms A and B, when using the Spearman-Brown Prophecy formula, gave a reliability of .95. When correlated with the Minnesota Tennis Knowledge test, r = .81, and with Scott's Achievement Examinations for Elementary and Intermediate Tennis, r = .86; this would indicate sufficient validity. Scoring key and grading scale for each form is included at the end of the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信