{"title":"bill Ma'tsur和bill Ra'yi解译结论中最近邻算法作为建模的比较","authors":"Afrizal Nur, Mustakim, M. Yasir, Zurriyata Fatni","doi":"10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tafsir is one of many media utilized to convey the message of the Quran to readers. There are two types of tafsir, namely bil ma'tsur and bil ra'yi, which are grouped based on its respective sources known as shahih and dhaif. The main issue in practicality is differentiating between the two groups is not always easy. The technique most often used in machine learning for classification is the K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN). On the other hand, K-NN has 3 variations of the algorithm, namely Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor (FK-NN), Modified K-Nearest Neighbor (MK-NN), and Improvement K-Nearest Neighbor (IK-NN). This study compares the four algorithms by modeling the best algorithm based on algorithm performance and algorithm complexity. From this research, it was found that MK-NN is a reliable algorithm with an accuracy of 98.07% and a processing time of 2.97 minutes in the deduction of bil ra’yi and bil ma’tsur with 486 documents in Surah Al-Baqoroh and Surah Ali Imron as samples. Furthermore, the best modeling of MK-NN is implemented into a programming language for the application of determining the type of interpretation, with the results of the User Acceptance Test (UAT) and user ease of approaching 99%.","PeriodicalId":178443,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of Nearest Neighbor Algorithm as Modeling in Conclusion of Interpretation of Bil Ma'tsur and Bil Ra'yi\",\"authors\":\"Afrizal Nur, Mustakim, M. Yasir, Zurriyata Fatni\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tafsir is one of many media utilized to convey the message of the Quran to readers. There are two types of tafsir, namely bil ma'tsur and bil ra'yi, which are grouped based on its respective sources known as shahih and dhaif. The main issue in practicality is differentiating between the two groups is not always easy. The technique most often used in machine learning for classification is the K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN). On the other hand, K-NN has 3 variations of the algorithm, namely Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor (FK-NN), Modified K-Nearest Neighbor (MK-NN), and Improvement K-Nearest Neighbor (IK-NN). This study compares the four algorithms by modeling the best algorithm based on algorithm performance and algorithm complexity. From this research, it was found that MK-NN is a reliable algorithm with an accuracy of 98.07% and a processing time of 2.97 minutes in the deduction of bil ra’yi and bil ma’tsur with 486 documents in Surah Al-Baqoroh and Surah Ali Imron as samples. Furthermore, the best modeling of MK-NN is implemented into a programming language for the application of determining the type of interpretation, with the results of the User Acceptance Test (UAT) and user ease of approaching 99%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
Tafsir是用来向读者传达《古兰经》信息的众多媒体之一。有两种类型的tafsir,即bil ma'tsur和bil ra'yi,根据其各自的来源(称为shahih和dhaif)进行分组。实际的主要问题是,区分这两类人并不总是那么容易。机器学习中最常用的分类技术是k -最近邻(K-NN)。另一方面,K-NN算法有3种变体,即模糊k -近邻(FK-NN)、改进k -近邻(MK-NN)和改进k -近邻(IK-NN)。本文根据算法性能和算法复杂度对四种算法进行了比较,并对最佳算法进行了建模。通过本研究发现,MK-NN算法在以Al-Baqoroh和Surah Ali Imron的486份文档为样本的bil ra 'yi和bil ma 'tsur的推断中,准确率为98.07%,处理时间为2.97分钟,是一种可靠的算法。此外,将MK-NN的最佳建模实现到一种编程语言中,用于确定解释类型的应用,用户接受测试(UAT)和用户易用性的结果接近99%。
The Comparison of Nearest Neighbor Algorithm as Modeling in Conclusion of Interpretation of Bil Ma'tsur and Bil Ra'yi
Tafsir is one of many media utilized to convey the message of the Quran to readers. There are two types of tafsir, namely bil ma'tsur and bil ra'yi, which are grouped based on its respective sources known as shahih and dhaif. The main issue in practicality is differentiating between the two groups is not always easy. The technique most often used in machine learning for classification is the K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN). On the other hand, K-NN has 3 variations of the algorithm, namely Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor (FK-NN), Modified K-Nearest Neighbor (MK-NN), and Improvement K-Nearest Neighbor (IK-NN). This study compares the four algorithms by modeling the best algorithm based on algorithm performance and algorithm complexity. From this research, it was found that MK-NN is a reliable algorithm with an accuracy of 98.07% and a processing time of 2.97 minutes in the deduction of bil ra’yi and bil ma’tsur with 486 documents in Surah Al-Baqoroh and Surah Ali Imron as samples. Furthermore, the best modeling of MK-NN is implemented into a programming language for the application of determining the type of interpretation, with the results of the User Acceptance Test (UAT) and user ease of approaching 99%.