员工创造力的先行性:来自巴基斯坦IT、教育和广告部门的证据

Abdullah Shahid, D. Siddiqui
{"title":"员工创造力的先行性:来自巴基斯坦IT、教育和广告部门的证据","authors":"Abdullah Shahid, D. Siddiqui","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3683135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to propose an elaborative theoretical framework to assess factors that influences creativity. We combine (Teresa M. Amabile et al., 1996; Jothi & Hin, 2015; Lin & Liu, 2012; Yeh & Huan, 2017) models featuring work and its environmental-related factors into one holistic framework to assess the antecedents and consequence of creativity. We propose two-level mediation to assess the effect of environmental variables on innovation and motivations through creativity as well as Job Stressors. Environmental factors included Leaders Behavior, Freedom, Resources, Social Support, Workload, Perceived Organizational Support, Person job fit, and Challenging work. Perceived Organizational Support was further affected by Organizational impediments, Supervisory encouragement, and Workgroup supports. These factors influence Job Stressors that include Challenge and Hindrance stressors, and work pressures in the environment. These stressors further affect creativity as proposed by Zhang & Wee (2018). We also categorize creativity into Quantity and Quality as per Yeh & Huan, (2017). Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey of employees in high creativity sectors like IT, Educational, and Advertisement. The result shows that among work and environmental factors, only Leaders Behavior, Perceived Organizational Support, and Challenging work significantly affect job stressors. On the contrary, job stressors significantly affect both Quantity and Quality of creativity. However, the subsequent effect of creativity on innovation and motivation could not be established.","PeriodicalId":155423,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Employee Performance Appraisal Systems (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antecedence of Employees’ Creativity: Evidence from IT, Educational and Advertisement Sectors of Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Shahid, D. Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3683135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to propose an elaborative theoretical framework to assess factors that influences creativity. We combine (Teresa M. Amabile et al., 1996; Jothi & Hin, 2015; Lin & Liu, 2012; Yeh & Huan, 2017) models featuring work and its environmental-related factors into one holistic framework to assess the antecedents and consequence of creativity. We propose two-level mediation to assess the effect of environmental variables on innovation and motivations through creativity as well as Job Stressors. Environmental factors included Leaders Behavior, Freedom, Resources, Social Support, Workload, Perceived Organizational Support, Person job fit, and Challenging work. Perceived Organizational Support was further affected by Organizational impediments, Supervisory encouragement, and Workgroup supports. These factors influence Job Stressors that include Challenge and Hindrance stressors, and work pressures in the environment. These stressors further affect creativity as proposed by Zhang & Wee (2018). We also categorize creativity into Quantity and Quality as per Yeh & Huan, (2017). Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey of employees in high creativity sectors like IT, Educational, and Advertisement. The result shows that among work and environmental factors, only Leaders Behavior, Perceived Organizational Support, and Challenging work significantly affect job stressors. On the contrary, job stressors significantly affect both Quantity and Quality of creativity. However, the subsequent effect of creativity on innovation and motivation could not be established.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORG: Employee Performance Appraisal Systems (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORG: Employee Performance Appraisal Systems (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Employee Performance Appraisal Systems (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在提出一个详尽的理论框架来评估影响创造力的因素。我们结合(Teresa M. Amabile et al., 1996;Jothi,欣,2015;林,刘,2012;叶,Huan, 2017)将工作及其环境相关因素纳入一个整体框架,以评估创造力的前因和后果。我们提出了两级中介来评估环境变量通过创造力和工作压力源对创新和动机的影响。环境因素包括领导行为、自由、资源、社会支持、工作量、感知组织支持、个人工作适合度和工作挑战性。感知组织支持进一步受到组织障碍、主管鼓励和工作组支持的影响。这些因素影响工作压力源,包括挑战和阻碍压力源,以及环境中的工作压力。这些压力源进一步影响创造力,Zhang &凌晨(2018)。我们也根据Yeh &将创意分为数量和质量。欢,(2017)。实证效度是通过对IT、教育和广告等高创造力行业的员工进行调查来确定的。结果表明,在工作和环境因素中,只有领导者行为、感知组织支持和挑战性工作对工作压力源有显著影响。相反,工作压力源对创造力的数量和质量都有显著影响。然而,创造力对创新和动机的后续影响尚不能确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antecedence of Employees’ Creativity: Evidence from IT, Educational and Advertisement Sectors of Pakistan
This study aims to propose an elaborative theoretical framework to assess factors that influences creativity. We combine (Teresa M. Amabile et al., 1996; Jothi & Hin, 2015; Lin & Liu, 2012; Yeh & Huan, 2017) models featuring work and its environmental-related factors into one holistic framework to assess the antecedents and consequence of creativity. We propose two-level mediation to assess the effect of environmental variables on innovation and motivations through creativity as well as Job Stressors. Environmental factors included Leaders Behavior, Freedom, Resources, Social Support, Workload, Perceived Organizational Support, Person job fit, and Challenging work. Perceived Organizational Support was further affected by Organizational impediments, Supervisory encouragement, and Workgroup supports. These factors influence Job Stressors that include Challenge and Hindrance stressors, and work pressures in the environment. These stressors further affect creativity as proposed by Zhang & Wee (2018). We also categorize creativity into Quantity and Quality as per Yeh & Huan, (2017). Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey of employees in high creativity sectors like IT, Educational, and Advertisement. The result shows that among work and environmental factors, only Leaders Behavior, Perceived Organizational Support, and Challenging work significantly affect job stressors. On the contrary, job stressors significantly affect both Quantity and Quality of creativity. However, the subsequent effect of creativity on innovation and motivation could not be established.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信