医生公地:平民对公平与信托的影响

L. Brown
{"title":"医生公地:平民对公平与信托的影响","authors":"L. Brown","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The core of this article lies in its broad examination of the influence that civil law and the now defunct Doctors’ Commons may have had on equity and trusts. Doctors’ Commons was like an Inn of Court for civil lawyers based in England. Historically, these civilian practitioners had a monopoly over certain legal jurisdictions, including wills and probate. To show the civilians’ influence, this article examines Doctors’ Commons’ dominion over the proving of wills. It further looks at the civil law’s possible development of equity’s core concepts, with a specific focus on the Graeco-Roman concept of “conscience”.","PeriodicalId":171463,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doctors’ Commons: the Civilians’ Influence on Equity and Trusts\",\"authors\":\"L. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttad065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The core of this article lies in its broad examination of the influence that civil law and the now defunct Doctors’ Commons may have had on equity and trusts. Doctors’ Commons was like an Inn of Court for civil lawyers based in England. Historically, these civilian practitioners had a monopoly over certain legal jurisdictions, including wills and probate. To show the civilians’ influence, this article examines Doctors’ Commons’ dominion over the proving of wills. It further looks at the civil law’s possible development of equity’s core concepts, with a specific focus on the Graeco-Roman concept of “conscience”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的核心在于它对民法和现已不复存在的医生公地可能对衡平法和信托产生的影响的广泛考察。医生公地就像英国民事律师的法庭客栈。从历史上看,这些民事从业者垄断了某些法律管辖范围,包括遗嘱和遗嘱认证。为了显示平民的影响,本文考察了医生公地对遗嘱证明的支配。本文进一步探讨了衡平法核心概念的可能发展,并特别关注了希腊-罗马的“良心”概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Doctors’ Commons: the Civilians’ Influence on Equity and Trusts
The core of this article lies in its broad examination of the influence that civil law and the now defunct Doctors’ Commons may have had on equity and trusts. Doctors’ Commons was like an Inn of Court for civil lawyers based in England. Historically, these civilian practitioners had a monopoly over certain legal jurisdictions, including wills and probate. To show the civilians’ influence, this article examines Doctors’ Commons’ dominion over the proving of wills. It further looks at the civil law’s possible development of equity’s core concepts, with a specific focus on the Graeco-Roman concept of “conscience”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信