{"title":"什么时候一美元不值一美元?“被困”的现金争议","authors":"Russell P. Engel, Bridget M. Lyons","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2362078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During 2013 the concept of \"trapped cash\" garnered heightened attention as reports of Dell, Apple and other firms holding massive cash levels outside the US surfaced. So called \"trapped cash\" refers to cash and liquid investments held by subsidiaries located outside the United States. Firms with overseas subsidiaries located in jurisdictions where the tax rate is lower than the rates in the US can reduce taxes by attributing profits to foreign locales. But bringing the cash back to the US subjects the funds to the US corporate tax rate, less credit for foreign income taxes paid. The House Ways and Means Committee held hearings in June 2013 to examine corporate profit shifting by multinationals. This followed hearings held by The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in May 2013 which focused on tax strategies at Apple and earlier hearings in September 2012 which focused on Microsoft and Hewlett Packard. Some have accused global firms of acting to avoid taxes leading to perhaps several billions of dollars of lost tax revenues. Others note that the real culprit is a US tax code with the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world. As the debate has raged, the Internal Revenue Service has sought to prohibit strategies related to intangible assets that the IRS claims firms have exploited to repatriate profits without tax implications. While the topic impacts all firms with liquid investments held outside of the US, this issue has been particularly important recently in the technology sector since over the past few years tech firms have amassed high cash levels from overseas operations as earnings strengthened and shrinking growth rates provided fewer investment opportunities.Here we use the technology sector as a case study to: examine the magnitude of the issue, consider firm options for \"trapped\" cash and assess the valuation investors should place on trapped cash.","PeriodicalId":385233,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When is a Dollar Not Worth a Dollar? The 'Trapped' Cash Controversy\",\"authors\":\"Russell P. Engel, Bridget M. Lyons\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2362078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During 2013 the concept of \\\"trapped cash\\\" garnered heightened attention as reports of Dell, Apple and other firms holding massive cash levels outside the US surfaced. So called \\\"trapped cash\\\" refers to cash and liquid investments held by subsidiaries located outside the United States. Firms with overseas subsidiaries located in jurisdictions where the tax rate is lower than the rates in the US can reduce taxes by attributing profits to foreign locales. But bringing the cash back to the US subjects the funds to the US corporate tax rate, less credit for foreign income taxes paid. The House Ways and Means Committee held hearings in June 2013 to examine corporate profit shifting by multinationals. This followed hearings held by The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in May 2013 which focused on tax strategies at Apple and earlier hearings in September 2012 which focused on Microsoft and Hewlett Packard. Some have accused global firms of acting to avoid taxes leading to perhaps several billions of dollars of lost tax revenues. Others note that the real culprit is a US tax code with the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world. As the debate has raged, the Internal Revenue Service has sought to prohibit strategies related to intangible assets that the IRS claims firms have exploited to repatriate profits without tax implications. While the topic impacts all firms with liquid investments held outside of the US, this issue has been particularly important recently in the technology sector since over the past few years tech firms have amassed high cash levels from overseas operations as earnings strengthened and shrinking growth rates provided fewer investment opportunities.Here we use the technology sector as a case study to: examine the magnitude of the issue, consider firm options for \\\"trapped\\\" cash and assess the valuation investors should place on trapped cash.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2362078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2362078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
2013年,随着戴尔(Dell)、苹果(Apple)等公司在美国境外持有大量现金的报道浮出水面,“现金陷阱”的概念引起了人们的高度关注。所谓的“困现金”是指美国境外子公司持有的现金和流动投资。在税率低于美国的司法管辖区设有海外子公司的公司,可以通过将利润转移到外国地区来减少税收。但将现金带回美国需要缴纳美国企业税率,减少对已缴纳外国所得税的抵免。众议院筹款委员会(House Ways and Means Committee)于2013年6月举行听证会,审查跨国公司的利润转移。此前,参议院常设调查小组委员会于2013年5月举行了听证会,重点关注苹果的税收策略,2012年9月举行了听证会,重点关注微软和惠普。一些人指责跨国公司的避税行为可能导致数十亿美元的税收损失。其他人指出,真正的罪魁祸首是美国的税法,它的企业税率是发达国家中最高的。随着争论愈演愈烈,美国国税局(Internal Revenue Service)试图禁止与无形资产相关的策略。国税局声称,企业利用无形资产将利润汇回国内,而不涉及税收。虽然这个话题影响到所有在美国境外持有流动性投资的公司,但这个问题最近在科技行业尤为重要,因为在过去几年里,随着盈利增强和增长率下降提供的投资机会减少,科技公司从海外业务中积累了大量现金。在这里,我们以科技行业为例研究:检查问题的严重性,考虑“被困”现金的公司选择,并评估投资者应该对被困现金的估值。
When is a Dollar Not Worth a Dollar? The 'Trapped' Cash Controversy
During 2013 the concept of "trapped cash" garnered heightened attention as reports of Dell, Apple and other firms holding massive cash levels outside the US surfaced. So called "trapped cash" refers to cash and liquid investments held by subsidiaries located outside the United States. Firms with overseas subsidiaries located in jurisdictions where the tax rate is lower than the rates in the US can reduce taxes by attributing profits to foreign locales. But bringing the cash back to the US subjects the funds to the US corporate tax rate, less credit for foreign income taxes paid. The House Ways and Means Committee held hearings in June 2013 to examine corporate profit shifting by multinationals. This followed hearings held by The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in May 2013 which focused on tax strategies at Apple and earlier hearings in September 2012 which focused on Microsoft and Hewlett Packard. Some have accused global firms of acting to avoid taxes leading to perhaps several billions of dollars of lost tax revenues. Others note that the real culprit is a US tax code with the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world. As the debate has raged, the Internal Revenue Service has sought to prohibit strategies related to intangible assets that the IRS claims firms have exploited to repatriate profits without tax implications. While the topic impacts all firms with liquid investments held outside of the US, this issue has been particularly important recently in the technology sector since over the past few years tech firms have amassed high cash levels from overseas operations as earnings strengthened and shrinking growth rates provided fewer investment opportunities.Here we use the technology sector as a case study to: examine the magnitude of the issue, consider firm options for "trapped" cash and assess the valuation investors should place on trapped cash.