哪些可视化工具,为什么?比较学生和实习设计师对数字素描的看法

C. Ranscombe, Katherine Bissett-Johnson, Wenwen Zhang, B. Eisenbart, C. Lauff
{"title":"哪些可视化工具,为什么?比较学生和实习设计师对数字素描的看法","authors":"C. Ranscombe, Katherine Bissett-Johnson, Wenwen Zhang, B. Eisenbart, C. Lauff","doi":"10.35199/epde.2020.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different design tools offer a variety of different benefits to designers at different stages in the design process. Yet, as digital design tools develop, providing more nuanced utility, we observe a challenge for design educators in teaching as per both how and when to apply said tools. This paper contributes to the discussion around digital tools in design education by comparing student perceptions of digital sketching with those of practicing designers. We do so from the perspective of the characteristics of digital sketching that are referenced by participants when describing its application in a typical design process. Results show how characteristics relating to representation of ideas and usability are widely referenced by both groups; however, we found a difference in practicing designers’ referencing of time characteristics more so than students. Based on this difference in the way digital sketching is perceived, we conclude that greater consideration how different tools influence the time taken to create a visualisation, and thus speed of iteration, is the key to educating students on how to consider and select different design tools.","PeriodicalId":372294,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WHICH VISUALISATION TOOLS AND WHY? COMPARING PERCEPTIONS OF STUDENT AND PRACTICING DESIGNERS TOWARD DIGITAL SKETCHING\",\"authors\":\"C. Ranscombe, Katherine Bissett-Johnson, Wenwen Zhang, B. Eisenbart, C. Lauff\",\"doi\":\"10.35199/epde.2020.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different design tools offer a variety of different benefits to designers at different stages in the design process. Yet, as digital design tools develop, providing more nuanced utility, we observe a challenge for design educators in teaching as per both how and when to apply said tools. This paper contributes to the discussion around digital tools in design education by comparing student perceptions of digital sketching with those of practicing designers. We do so from the perspective of the characteristics of digital sketching that are referenced by participants when describing its application in a typical design process. Results show how characteristics relating to representation of ideas and usability are widely referenced by both groups; however, we found a difference in practicing designers’ referencing of time characteristics more so than students. Based on this difference in the way digital sketching is perceived, we conclude that greater consideration how different tools influence the time taken to create a visualisation, and thus speed of iteration, is the key to educating students on how to consider and select different design tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2020.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2020.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不同的设计工具在设计过程的不同阶段为设计师提供了各种不同的好处。然而,随着数字设计工具的发展,提供了更细致的实用程序,我们观察到设计教育者在教学中如何以及何时应用这些工具的挑战。本文通过比较学生和实践设计师对数字素描的看法,对设计教育中数字工具的讨论做出了贡献。我们从参与者在描述其在典型设计过程中的应用时所引用的数字素描的特征的角度来这样做。结果显示,与想法的表达和可用性相关的特征是如何被两组广泛引用的;然而,我们发现实习设计师对时间特征的引用比学生更多。基于这种感知数字素描方式的差异,我们得出结论,更多地考虑不同工具如何影响创建可视化所需的时间,从而迭代的速度,是教育学生如何考虑和选择不同设计工具的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WHICH VISUALISATION TOOLS AND WHY? COMPARING PERCEPTIONS OF STUDENT AND PRACTICING DESIGNERS TOWARD DIGITAL SKETCHING
Different design tools offer a variety of different benefits to designers at different stages in the design process. Yet, as digital design tools develop, providing more nuanced utility, we observe a challenge for design educators in teaching as per both how and when to apply said tools. This paper contributes to the discussion around digital tools in design education by comparing student perceptions of digital sketching with those of practicing designers. We do so from the perspective of the characteristics of digital sketching that are referenced by participants when describing its application in a typical design process. Results show how characteristics relating to representation of ideas and usability are widely referenced by both groups; however, we found a difference in practicing designers’ referencing of time characteristics more so than students. Based on this difference in the way digital sketching is perceived, we conclude that greater consideration how different tools influence the time taken to create a visualisation, and thus speed of iteration, is the key to educating students on how to consider and select different design tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信