干涉契约自由的案例?指派禁令的实证研究

LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic) Pub Date : 2015-10-21 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2677321

H. Beale, L. Gullifer, Sarah Paterson

{"title":"干涉契约自由的案例?指派禁令的实证研究","authors":"H. Beale, L. Gullifer, Sarah Paterson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2677321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do \"bans on assignment\" of trade receivables cause serious problems with receivables financing? Should Government render them ineffective? Two empirical investigations suggest that though there are good reasons for using BoAs, they cause disproportionate problems to SMEs needing to factor their debts, and there is a good case for intervention","PeriodicalId":430410,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case for Interfering with Freedom of Contract? An Empirically-Informed Study of Bans on Assignment\",\"authors\":\"H. Beale, L. Gullifer, Sarah Paterson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2677321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Do \\\"bans on assignment\\\" of trade receivables cause serious problems with receivables financing? Should Government render them ineffective? Two empirical investigations suggest that though there are good reasons for using BoAs, they cause disproportionate problems to SMEs needing to factor their debts, and there is a good case for intervention\",\"PeriodicalId\":430410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2677321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2677321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 23

摘要

贸易应收款的“禁止转让”是否会导致应收款融资出现严重问题?政府是否应该使它们失效?两项实证调查表明，尽管使用boa有很好的理由，但它们对需要考虑债务因素的中小企业造成不成比例的问题，并且有一个很好的干预案例

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Case for Interfering with Freedom of Contract? An Empirically-Informed Study of Bans on Assignment

Do "bans on assignment" of trade receivables cause serious problems with receivables financing? Should Government render them ineffective? Two empirical investigations suggest that though there are good reasons for using BoAs, they cause disproportionate problems to SMEs needing to factor their debts, and there is a good case for intervention

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量