在经过认证的用户评论的支持下,对移动应用程序进行真正的评级

K. Manoj, T. Sandeep, Dr. N Sudhakar Reddy, P. Alikhan
{"title":"在经过认证的用户评论的支持下,对移动应用程序进行真正的评级","authors":"K. Manoj, T. Sandeep, Dr. N Sudhakar Reddy, P. Alikhan","doi":"10.1109/ICGCIOT.2018.8753068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ranking fraud on the mobile app market refers liable to mislead activities which have a purpose of bumping up the apps in popularity list. Because of this, app users have no facility to express their views. This is the same technique in ratings also. It ends up bringing increasing number of visits for application engineers to build the spreading of their application deals or application appraisals to submit the positioning extortion. It mainly provides a view of reviews to impact on the mobile apps or products and also detects the fake review list by the users. There are mainly three evidences to end up plainly mindful of the fraud in the mobile apps, i.e., positioning-based confirmations, rating-based confirmations, and finally review-based evidences. Compared to the remaining two evidences, review-based evidences are most helpful to the users who are trying to download new apps. Here, the main concern is the reviews of the authenticated users, that is, the users who already have an account in that field. And review-based evidences are very crucial. We precisely find the positioning extortion by mining dynamic periods in particular driving sessions for mobile apps and also discuss how the reviews are most useful for the new clients.","PeriodicalId":269682,"journal":{"name":"2018 Second International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genuine ratings for mobile apps with the support of authenticated users’ reviews\",\"authors\":\"K. Manoj, T. Sandeep, Dr. N Sudhakar Reddy, P. Alikhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICGCIOT.2018.8753068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ranking fraud on the mobile app market refers liable to mislead activities which have a purpose of bumping up the apps in popularity list. Because of this, app users have no facility to express their views. This is the same technique in ratings also. It ends up bringing increasing number of visits for application engineers to build the spreading of their application deals or application appraisals to submit the positioning extortion. It mainly provides a view of reviews to impact on the mobile apps or products and also detects the fake review list by the users. There are mainly three evidences to end up plainly mindful of the fraud in the mobile apps, i.e., positioning-based confirmations, rating-based confirmations, and finally review-based evidences. Compared to the remaining two evidences, review-based evidences are most helpful to the users who are trying to download new apps. Here, the main concern is the reviews of the authenticated users, that is, the users who already have an account in that field. And review-based evidences are very crucial. We precisely find the positioning extortion by mining dynamic periods in particular driving sessions for mobile apps and also discuss how the reviews are most useful for the new clients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Second International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Second International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGCIOT.2018.8753068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Second International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGCIOT.2018.8753068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

手机应用市场中的排名欺诈指的是为了提高应用在热门榜单上的排名而进行的误导活动。因此,应用程序用户无法表达自己的观点。这在评级中也是同样的技术。它最终为应用程序工程师带来了越来越多的访问,以建立他们的应用程序交易的传播或应用程序评估,以提交定位勒索。它主要提供对移动应用或产品的影响的评论视图,并检测用户的虚假评论列表。对于手机应用中的欺诈行为,主要有三种证据,即基于定位的确认,基于评级的确认,最后是基于审查的证据。与其他两种证据相比,基于评论的证据对尝试下载新应用的用户最有帮助。在这里,主要关注的是对经过身份验证的用户的审查,即已经在该字段中拥有帐户的用户。基于评论的证据非常重要。我们通过挖掘移动应用程序的动态时段来精确地发现定位勒索,并讨论评论如何对新客户最有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genuine ratings for mobile apps with the support of authenticated users’ reviews
Ranking fraud on the mobile app market refers liable to mislead activities which have a purpose of bumping up the apps in popularity list. Because of this, app users have no facility to express their views. This is the same technique in ratings also. It ends up bringing increasing number of visits for application engineers to build the spreading of their application deals or application appraisals to submit the positioning extortion. It mainly provides a view of reviews to impact on the mobile apps or products and also detects the fake review list by the users. There are mainly three evidences to end up plainly mindful of the fraud in the mobile apps, i.e., positioning-based confirmations, rating-based confirmations, and finally review-based evidences. Compared to the remaining two evidences, review-based evidences are most helpful to the users who are trying to download new apps. Here, the main concern is the reviews of the authenticated users, that is, the users who already have an account in that field. And review-based evidences are very crucial. We precisely find the positioning extortion by mining dynamic periods in particular driving sessions for mobile apps and also discuss how the reviews are most useful for the new clients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信