教育史上的方法

W. Richardson
{"title":"教育史上的方法","authors":"W. Richardson","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199340033.013.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the development of method in the practice of history, both oral and literate, and how this has influenced the study of education. The momentum of the European Enlightenment and, since the 1920s, the professionalization of historians in universities has propelled an increasingly global written method. This ubiquity is the product of national education programs but remains contested by those speaking for cultures where the intimidating power of the Enlightenment is resisted through oral method. Nevertheless most historians who write have pressed on unperturbed. The result is a corpus of history about education which, since the 1960s, has grown not only in volume but in the breadth of its concerns, the range of questions historians of education broach, the kinds of sources they use, and the ways these are deployed. However, this breadth of outlook has not resolved the fundamental tension between method in written and oral history.","PeriodicalId":257427,"journal":{"name":"The [Oxford] Handbook of the History of Education","volume":"8 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method in the History of Education\",\"authors\":\"W. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199340033.013.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores the development of method in the practice of history, both oral and literate, and how this has influenced the study of education. The momentum of the European Enlightenment and, since the 1920s, the professionalization of historians in universities has propelled an increasingly global written method. This ubiquity is the product of national education programs but remains contested by those speaking for cultures where the intimidating power of the Enlightenment is resisted through oral method. Nevertheless most historians who write have pressed on unperturbed. The result is a corpus of history about education which, since the 1960s, has grown not only in volume but in the breadth of its concerns, the range of questions historians of education broach, the kinds of sources they use, and the ways these are deployed. However, this breadth of outlook has not resolved the fundamental tension between method in written and oral history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The [Oxford] Handbook of the History of Education\",\"volume\":\"8 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The [Oxford] Handbook of the History of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199340033.013.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The [Oxford] Handbook of the History of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199340033.013.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨了口头和文字历史实践中方法的发展,以及这对教育研究的影响。欧洲启蒙运动的势头,以及自20世纪20年代以来,大学历史学家的专业化,推动了一种日益全球化的书面方法。这种无处不在的现象是国家教育计划的产物,但仍然受到那些代表文化的人的质疑,在这些文化中,启蒙运动的威吓力量是通过口头方式抵制的。尽管如此,大多数写文章的历史学家都泰然自若地继续写下去。其结果是,自20世纪60年代以来,关于教育的历史语料库不仅在数量上增长,而且在关注的范围上增长,教育历史学家提出的问题的范围,他们使用的资源种类,以及这些资源的使用方式。然而,这种视野的广度并没有解决书面历史和口述历史之间的根本紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Method in the History of Education
This chapter explores the development of method in the practice of history, both oral and literate, and how this has influenced the study of education. The momentum of the European Enlightenment and, since the 1920s, the professionalization of historians in universities has propelled an increasingly global written method. This ubiquity is the product of national education programs but remains contested by those speaking for cultures where the intimidating power of the Enlightenment is resisted through oral method. Nevertheless most historians who write have pressed on unperturbed. The result is a corpus of history about education which, since the 1960s, has grown not only in volume but in the breadth of its concerns, the range of questions historians of education broach, the kinds of sources they use, and the ways these are deployed. However, this breadth of outlook has not resolved the fundamental tension between method in written and oral history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信