调查Python中的类型声明不匹配

L. Pascarella, Achyudh Ram, A. Nadeem, Dinesh Bisesser, Norman Knyazev, Alberto Bacchelli
{"title":"调查Python中的类型声明不匹配","authors":"L. Pascarella, Achyudh Ram, A. Nadeem, Dinesh Bisesser, Norman Knyazev, Alberto Bacchelli","doi":"10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past research provided evidence that developers making code changes sometimes omit to update the related documentation, thus creating inconsistencies that may contribute to faults and crashes. In dynamically typed languages, such as Python, an inconsistency in the documentation may lead to a mismatch in type declarations only visible at runtime. With our study, we investigate how often the documentation is inconsistent in a sample of 239 methods from five Python open-source software projects. Our results highlight that more than 20% of the comments are either partially defined or entirely missing and that almost 1% of the methods in the analyzed projects contain type inconsistencies. Based on these results, we create a tool, PyID, to early detect type mismatches in Python documentation and we evaluate its performance with our oracle.","PeriodicalId":345739,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating type declaration mismatches in Python\",\"authors\":\"L. Pascarella, Achyudh Ram, A. Nadeem, Dinesh Bisesser, Norman Knyazev, Alberto Bacchelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Past research provided evidence that developers making code changes sometimes omit to update the related documentation, thus creating inconsistencies that may contribute to faults and crashes. In dynamically typed languages, such as Python, an inconsistency in the documentation may lead to a mismatch in type declarations only visible at runtime. With our study, we investigate how often the documentation is inconsistent in a sample of 239 methods from five Python open-source software projects. Our results highlight that more than 20% of the comments are either partially defined or entirely missing and that almost 1% of the methods in the analyzed projects contain type inconsistencies. Based on these results, we create a tool, PyID, to early detect type mismatches in Python documentation and we evaluate its performance with our oracle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

过去的研究提供的证据表明,开发人员在进行代码更改时有时会忽略更新相关文档,从而造成可能导致错误和崩溃的不一致。在动态类型语言(如Python)中,文档中的不一致可能导致仅在运行时可见的类型声明不匹配。在我们的研究中,我们调查了来自五个Python开源软件项目的239种方法样本中文档不一致的频率。我们的结果强调,超过20%的注释要么是部分定义的,要么是完全缺失的,并且在分析的项目中,几乎有1%的方法包含类型不一致。基于这些结果,我们创建了一个工具PyID,用于早期检测Python文档中的类型不匹配,并使用oracle评估其性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating type declaration mismatches in Python
Past research provided evidence that developers making code changes sometimes omit to update the related documentation, thus creating inconsistencies that may contribute to faults and crashes. In dynamically typed languages, such as Python, an inconsistency in the documentation may lead to a mismatch in type declarations only visible at runtime. With our study, we investigate how often the documentation is inconsistent in a sample of 239 methods from five Python open-source software projects. Our results highlight that more than 20% of the comments are either partially defined or entirely missing and that almost 1% of the methods in the analyzed projects contain type inconsistencies. Based on these results, we create a tool, PyID, to early detect type mismatches in Python documentation and we evaluate its performance with our oracle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信