基于Drools和Jena规则的语义web事件处理系统性能比较

Andrew Fobel, N. Subramanian
{"title":"基于Drools和Jena规则的语义web事件处理系统性能比较","authors":"Andrew Fobel, N. Subramanian","doi":"10.1109/SERA.2016.7516153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Event processing systems (EPS) analyze events in real-time to extract useful information that enhances value for the stakeholders. In order to extract relevant information from the stream of events, EPS's typically embed a rule-based system (RBS) that react to events as soon as they occur. The performance of RBS becomes even more important when the events processed are generated on the semantic web, where events and their metadata may originate from a variety of sources but at a very high rate, often in excess of 107 events per second. For such a system the most appropriate RBS's seem to be Drools and Jena both of which are open-source and are tailored for the Java programming language. In this paper we present the requirements and design of an EPS for the semantic web as required by the Air Force Research Lab, and analyze the performance of Drools and Jena for this EPS. We developed prototype systems using Drools and Jena, and stressed each system with streams of high speed events. Based on our study we conclude that while Drools is about 40% faster, Jena consumes about 15% less memory. We summarize the findings from our study and discuss scenarios when each of these RBS's might be more suitable.","PeriodicalId":412361,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the performance of Drools and Jena rule-based systems for event processing on the semantic web\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Fobel, N. Subramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SERA.2016.7516153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Event processing systems (EPS) analyze events in real-time to extract useful information that enhances value for the stakeholders. In order to extract relevant information from the stream of events, EPS's typically embed a rule-based system (RBS) that react to events as soon as they occur. The performance of RBS becomes even more important when the events processed are generated on the semantic web, where events and their metadata may originate from a variety of sources but at a very high rate, often in excess of 107 events per second. For such a system the most appropriate RBS's seem to be Drools and Jena both of which are open-source and are tailored for the Java programming language. In this paper we present the requirements and design of an EPS for the semantic web as required by the Air Force Research Lab, and analyze the performance of Drools and Jena for this EPS. We developed prototype systems using Drools and Jena, and stressed each system with streams of high speed events. Based on our study we conclude that while Drools is about 40% faster, Jena consumes about 15% less memory. We summarize the findings from our study and discuss scenarios when each of these RBS's might be more suitable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA.2016.7516153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA.2016.7516153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

事件处理系统(EPS)实时分析事件,以提取有用的信息,提高涉众的价值。为了从事件流中提取相关信息,EPS通常嵌入一个基于规则的系统(RBS),该系统在事件发生时立即对事件做出反应。当处理的事件在语义web上生成时,RBS的性能变得更加重要,在语义web中,事件及其元数据可能来自各种来源,但速率非常高,通常超过每秒107个事件。对于这样一个系统,最合适的RBS似乎是Drools和Jena,它们都是开源的,并且是为Java编程语言量身定制的。本文根据美国空军研究实验室的要求,提出了语义网EPS的要求和设计,并分析了Drools和Jena在该EPS中的性能。我们使用Drools和Jena开发了原型系统,并使用高速事件流来强调每个系统。根据我们的研究,我们得出结论,虽然Drools快了40%,但Jena消耗的内存少了15%。我们总结了我们的研究结果,并讨论了每种RBS可能更适合的场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the performance of Drools and Jena rule-based systems for event processing on the semantic web
Event processing systems (EPS) analyze events in real-time to extract useful information that enhances value for the stakeholders. In order to extract relevant information from the stream of events, EPS's typically embed a rule-based system (RBS) that react to events as soon as they occur. The performance of RBS becomes even more important when the events processed are generated on the semantic web, where events and their metadata may originate from a variety of sources but at a very high rate, often in excess of 107 events per second. For such a system the most appropriate RBS's seem to be Drools and Jena both of which are open-source and are tailored for the Java programming language. In this paper we present the requirements and design of an EPS for the semantic web as required by the Air Force Research Lab, and analyze the performance of Drools and Jena for this EPS. We developed prototype systems using Drools and Jena, and stressed each system with streams of high speed events. Based on our study we conclude that while Drools is about 40% faster, Jena consumes about 15% less memory. We summarize the findings from our study and discuss scenarios when each of these RBS's might be more suitable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信