开发和管理要求:文献综述的结果

Edgar M. Serna, A. Serna
{"title":"开发和管理要求:文献综述的结果","authors":"Edgar M. Serna, A. Serna","doi":"10.1109/EATIS.2016.7520128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the literature, different models are proposed to manage the Requirements Engineering, which present advantages and disadvantages when properly specified customer requirements. In order to identify good practices of these models, a literature review was conducted to assess the characteristics and potential of the most popular. The results are described in this work, and concludes that a model to manage the requirements engineering should gather good practices found, and potentiate them with contributions from other areas of knowledge, as formal methods, discrete mathematics, logic, abstraction, and other related. This is because the current problems are more complex and complicated than before, security has become a key issue, the changes are every day, and delivery times of the software products have been drastically shortened, while budgets must be adjusted to their service life.","PeriodicalId":158157,"journal":{"name":"2016 8th Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems (EATIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and management requirements: Results of a literature review\",\"authors\":\"Edgar M. Serna, A. Serna\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EATIS.2016.7520128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the literature, different models are proposed to manage the Requirements Engineering, which present advantages and disadvantages when properly specified customer requirements. In order to identify good practices of these models, a literature review was conducted to assess the characteristics and potential of the most popular. The results are described in this work, and concludes that a model to manage the requirements engineering should gather good practices found, and potentiate them with contributions from other areas of knowledge, as formal methods, discrete mathematics, logic, abstraction, and other related. This is because the current problems are more complex and complicated than before, security has become a key issue, the changes are every day, and delivery times of the software products have been drastically shortened, while budgets must be adjusted to their service life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 8th Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems (EATIS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 8th Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems (EATIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EATIS.2016.7520128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 8th Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems (EATIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EATIS.2016.7520128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在文献中,提出了不同的模型来管理需求工程,这些模型在适当指定客户需求时呈现出优点和缺点。为了确定这些模型的良好实践,进行了文献综述,以评估最流行的模型的特征和潜力。在这项工作中描述了结果,并得出结论,管理需求工程的模型应该收集发现的良好实践,并通过来自其他知识领域的贡献来增强它们,如形式化方法、离散数学、逻辑、抽象和其他相关的方法。这是因为当前的问题比以前更加复杂和复杂,安全已经成为一个关键问题,每天都有变化,软件产品的交付时间已经大大缩短,而预算必须根据其使用寿命进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and management requirements: Results of a literature review
In the literature, different models are proposed to manage the Requirements Engineering, which present advantages and disadvantages when properly specified customer requirements. In order to identify good practices of these models, a literature review was conducted to assess the characteristics and potential of the most popular. The results are described in this work, and concludes that a model to manage the requirements engineering should gather good practices found, and potentiate them with contributions from other areas of knowledge, as formal methods, discrete mathematics, logic, abstraction, and other related. This is because the current problems are more complex and complicated than before, security has become a key issue, the changes are every day, and delivery times of the software products have been drastically shortened, while budgets must be adjusted to their service life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信