德国的回应

Oliver Thränert
{"title":"德国的回应","authors":"Oliver Thränert","doi":"10.1525/jps.1982.11-12.4-1.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2002, when the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the international arms control regime has included no limits on missile defense. Washington wants to keep it that way, insisting that it Òwill continue to reject any negotiated restraints on US ballistic missile defenses.Ó Many experts believe that missile defense undermines strategic stability; but some argue that missile defense can play a role in denuclearization. Here, Wu Riqiang of China (2015), Tatiana Anichkina of Russia (2015), and Oliver Thra¬nert of Germany debate whether arms control arrangements should include limits on missile defenseÑor whether advances in missile defense should be encouraged because they might contribute to disarmament.","PeriodicalId":322051,"journal":{"name":"An Army in Crisis","volume":"385 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The German Response\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Thränert\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/jps.1982.11-12.4-1.273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 2002, when the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the international arms control regime has included no limits on missile defense. Washington wants to keep it that way, insisting that it Òwill continue to reject any negotiated restraints on US ballistic missile defenses.Ó Many experts believe that missile defense undermines strategic stability; but some argue that missile defense can play a role in denuclearization. Here, Wu Riqiang of China (2015), Tatiana Anichkina of Russia (2015), and Oliver Thra¬nert of Germany debate whether arms control arrangements should include limits on missile defenseÑor whether advances in missile defense should be encouraged because they might contribute to disarmament.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"An Army in Crisis\",\"volume\":\"385 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"An Army in Crisis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.1982.11-12.4-1.273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"An Army in Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.1982.11-12.4-1.273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2002年美国退出《反弹道导弹条约》以来,国际军控体系对导弹防御没有任何限制。华盛顿方面希望保持这种状态,坚持Òwill继续拒绝任何针对美国弹道导弹防御系统的谈判限制。Ó许多专家认为导弹防御会破坏战略稳定;但也有人认为,导弹防御系统可以在无核化过程中发挥作用。在这里,中国的吴日强(2015)、俄罗斯的Tatiana Anichkina(2015)和德国的Oliver Thra - nert讨论军备控制安排是否应该包括对导弹的限制defenseÑor是否应该鼓励导弹防御方面的进展,因为它们可能有助于裁军。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The German Response
Since 2002, when the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the international arms control regime has included no limits on missile defense. Washington wants to keep it that way, insisting that it Òwill continue to reject any negotiated restraints on US ballistic missile defenses.Ó Many experts believe that missile defense undermines strategic stability; but some argue that missile defense can play a role in denuclearization. Here, Wu Riqiang of China (2015), Tatiana Anichkina of Russia (2015), and Oliver Thra¬nert of Germany debate whether arms control arrangements should include limits on missile defenseÑor whether advances in missile defense should be encouraged because they might contribute to disarmament.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信