{"title":"2019 – az adókikerülés elleni közös európai fellépés éve (2019 - The year of Joint EU Action Against Tax Avoidance)","authors":"Gabriella Erdős","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3676942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hungarian abstract: A cikk az adokikerules es agressziv adotervezes elleni altalanos magyar ado es polgari jogi elveinek a szisztematikus attekinteset adja. Az orszagban az adokikerules elleni kuzdelem altalanos es specialis szabalyainak tortenete hosszu időre nyulik vissza, kezdve a nem-rendeltetesszerű joggyakorlassal, a tartalom a forma előtt elven keresztul egeszen az ellenőrzott kulfoldi tarsasag es az alultőkesitesi szabalyokig. Ezeket a koncenpciokat azonban az OECD BEPS projekt es az EU Adokikerules Elleni Iranyelv (ATAD) fenyeben ujra kellett gondolni. A cikk ket alapvető kerdeskorre koncentral: a magyar polgari jogi elvek es adojogi megfelelőik kapcsolatara, azonossagaikra es kulonbozősegeikre, valamint Magyarorszag valasztasaira az ATAD adta lehetősegeken belul. A cikk vegkovetkeztetes az, hogy Magyarorszagnak nagyon erős altalanos adokikerules ellenes szabalyai vannak, azonban az ATAD atvetele soran a specifikus adokikerules ellenes szabalyokat annak legenyhebb formajaban vezette be annak erdekeben, hogy megtalalja a megfelelő egyensulyt az Eu joggal valo osszhang es a tőkebefektetesek osztonzese kozott. \n \nEnglish abstract: The article gives a systematic survey of the general tax and civil law principles against tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning in Hungary. Hungary has a long tradition of both GAAR and SAAR starting with general abuse of law clauses through substance over form rules to CFC and thin capitalization. These concepts, however, had to be rethought, modified and extended in the light of the OECD BEPS project and the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. The article focuses on two major issues: the relationship between the relevant civil law and the tax anti-avoidance rules, and the choices Hungary made when implementing the EU ATAD. The article concludes that Hungary has strong general anti-avoidance principles, but implemented the specific anti-tax avoidance measures of ATAD in their lightest form in order create a balance between EU compliance and FDI attraction capability.","PeriodicalId":282044,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
2019 – az adókikerülés elleni közös európai fellépés éve (2019 - The year of Joint EU Action Against Tax Avoidance)
Hungarian abstract: A cikk az adokikerules es agressziv adotervezes elleni altalanos magyar ado es polgari jogi elveinek a szisztematikus attekinteset adja. Az orszagban az adokikerules elleni kuzdelem altalanos es specialis szabalyainak tortenete hosszu időre nyulik vissza, kezdve a nem-rendeltetesszerű joggyakorlassal, a tartalom a forma előtt elven keresztul egeszen az ellenőrzott kulfoldi tarsasag es az alultőkesitesi szabalyokig. Ezeket a koncenpciokat azonban az OECD BEPS projekt es az EU Adokikerules Elleni Iranyelv (ATAD) fenyeben ujra kellett gondolni. A cikk ket alapvető kerdeskorre koncentral: a magyar polgari jogi elvek es adojogi megfelelőik kapcsolatara, azonossagaikra es kulonbozősegeikre, valamint Magyarorszag valasztasaira az ATAD adta lehetősegeken belul. A cikk vegkovetkeztetes az, hogy Magyarorszagnak nagyon erős altalanos adokikerules ellenes szabalyai vannak, azonban az ATAD atvetele soran a specifikus adokikerules ellenes szabalyokat annak legenyhebb formajaban vezette be annak erdekeben, hogy megtalalja a megfelelő egyensulyt az Eu joggal valo osszhang es a tőkebefektetesek osztonzese kozott.
English abstract: The article gives a systematic survey of the general tax and civil law principles against tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning in Hungary. Hungary has a long tradition of both GAAR and SAAR starting with general abuse of law clauses through substance over form rules to CFC and thin capitalization. These concepts, however, had to be rethought, modified and extended in the light of the OECD BEPS project and the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. The article focuses on two major issues: the relationship between the relevant civil law and the tax anti-avoidance rules, and the choices Hungary made when implementing the EU ATAD. The article concludes that Hungary has strong general anti-avoidance principles, but implemented the specific anti-tax avoidance measures of ATAD in their lightest form in order create a balance between EU compliance and FDI attraction capability.