80/20法则部分解释了7+/-2法则:一般基于系统的分析

Griselda Acosta, Eric Smith, V. Kreinovich
{"title":"80/20法则部分解释了7+/-2法则:一般基于系统的分析","authors":"Griselda Acosta, Eric Smith, V. Kreinovich","doi":"10.12988/imf.2019.9833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 80/20 rule and the 7 ± 2 law are examples of difficult to explain empirical facts. According to the 80/20 rule, in each activity, 20% of the people contribute to the 80% of the results. The 7± 2 law means that we divide objects into 7 ± 2 groups – i.e., into 5 to 9 groups. In this paper, we show that there is a relation between these two facts: namely, we show that, because of the 80/20 rule, the number of classes cannot be smaller than 5. Thus, the 80/20 rule explains the lower bound (5) on the 7 ± 2 law. 1 Formulation of the Problem Difficult-to-explain empirical facts. There are several difficult-to-explain empirical facts. • For example, there is a ubiquitous 80/20 rule, according to which, in each human activity, 80% of the results come from 20% of the participants. For example, 20% of the people own 80% of all the wealth, 20% of researchers publish 80% of all the papers, etc.; see, e.g., [1, 2] and references therein. • There is a known phenomenon in psychology called a 7 ± 2 law (see, e.g., [4, 5]), according to which each person usually classifies everything into a certain number of classes C; depending on the person, this number ranges from 7 − 2 = 5 to 7 + 2 = 9 classes.","PeriodicalId":107214,"journal":{"name":"International Mathematical Forum","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"80/20 Rule partially explains 7+/-2 law: general system-based analysis\",\"authors\":\"Griselda Acosta, Eric Smith, V. Kreinovich\",\"doi\":\"10.12988/imf.2019.9833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 80/20 rule and the 7 ± 2 law are examples of difficult to explain empirical facts. According to the 80/20 rule, in each activity, 20% of the people contribute to the 80% of the results. The 7± 2 law means that we divide objects into 7 ± 2 groups – i.e., into 5 to 9 groups. In this paper, we show that there is a relation between these two facts: namely, we show that, because of the 80/20 rule, the number of classes cannot be smaller than 5. Thus, the 80/20 rule explains the lower bound (5) on the 7 ± 2 law. 1 Formulation of the Problem Difficult-to-explain empirical facts. There are several difficult-to-explain empirical facts. • For example, there is a ubiquitous 80/20 rule, according to which, in each human activity, 80% of the results come from 20% of the participants. For example, 20% of the people own 80% of all the wealth, 20% of researchers publish 80% of all the papers, etc.; see, e.g., [1, 2] and references therein. • There is a known phenomenon in psychology called a 7 ± 2 law (see, e.g., [4, 5]), according to which each person usually classifies everything into a certain number of classes C; depending on the person, this number ranges from 7 − 2 = 5 to 7 + 2 = 9 classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Mathematical Forum\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Mathematical Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12988/imf.2019.9833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Mathematical Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12988/imf.2019.9833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

80/20法则和7±2法则是难以解释经验事实的例子。根据80/20法则,在每一项活动中,20%的人贡献了80%的结果。7±2定律是指我们把物体分成7±2组,即5到9组。在本文中,我们证明了这两个事实之间存在一种关系:即我们证明,由于80/20规则,类的数量不能小于5。因此,80/20规则解释了7±2定律的下界(5)。难以解释的经验事实。有几个难以解释的经验事实。•例如,有一个普遍存在的80/20规则,根据该规则,在每一项人类活动中,80%的结果来自20%的参与者。例如,20%的人拥有80%的财富,20%的研究人员发表80%的论文,等等;参见[1,2]和其中的参考文献。•心理学中有一种被称为7±2定律的已知现象(例如,参见[4,5]),根据该定律,每个人通常会将所有事物分为一定数量的类别;根据不同的人,这个数字的范围从7−2 = 5到7 + 2 = 9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
80/20 Rule partially explains 7+/-2 law: general system-based analysis
The 80/20 rule and the 7 ± 2 law are examples of difficult to explain empirical facts. According to the 80/20 rule, in each activity, 20% of the people contribute to the 80% of the results. The 7± 2 law means that we divide objects into 7 ± 2 groups – i.e., into 5 to 9 groups. In this paper, we show that there is a relation between these two facts: namely, we show that, because of the 80/20 rule, the number of classes cannot be smaller than 5. Thus, the 80/20 rule explains the lower bound (5) on the 7 ± 2 law. 1 Formulation of the Problem Difficult-to-explain empirical facts. There are several difficult-to-explain empirical facts. • For example, there is a ubiquitous 80/20 rule, according to which, in each human activity, 80% of the results come from 20% of the participants. For example, 20% of the people own 80% of all the wealth, 20% of researchers publish 80% of all the papers, etc.; see, e.g., [1, 2] and references therein. • There is a known phenomenon in psychology called a 7 ± 2 law (see, e.g., [4, 5]), according to which each person usually classifies everything into a certain number of classes C; depending on the person, this number ranges from 7 − 2 = 5 to 7 + 2 = 9 classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信