接地防震安全设计标准

W. Carman
{"title":"接地防震安全设计标准","authors":"W. Carman","doi":"10.1109/DTEC.2016.7731280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the physiological basis for shock safety standards, and how previously conflicting ambiguous standards are being re-aligned in Australia and other countries, using quantified risk analysis to calculate risk of fatality as the new design metric. While a simple one ohm grid resistance may be an adequate design target (even for a substation with a 50kA earth fault level, provided the power cable systems are intact), it has been universally recognised that tolerable touch voltages are a more appropriate metric for safety standards. However, discussions with over 100 engineers from 13 countries have shown that there is a large variety in approaches, ranging from blanket application of standard template configurations (independent of boundary conditions and approach applicability checks) to individually designed and commissioned installations. The new risk based design metric enables designers to more objectively justify the standard to apply for each exposure location.","PeriodicalId":417330,"journal":{"name":"2016 Down to Earth Conference (DTEC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Earthing shock safety design standards\",\"authors\":\"W. Carman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DTEC.2016.7731280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the physiological basis for shock safety standards, and how previously conflicting ambiguous standards are being re-aligned in Australia and other countries, using quantified risk analysis to calculate risk of fatality as the new design metric. While a simple one ohm grid resistance may be an adequate design target (even for a substation with a 50kA earth fault level, provided the power cable systems are intact), it has been universally recognised that tolerable touch voltages are a more appropriate metric for safety standards. However, discussions with over 100 engineers from 13 countries have shown that there is a large variety in approaches, ranging from blanket application of standard template configurations (independent of boundary conditions and approach applicability checks) to individually designed and commissioned installations. The new risk based design metric enables designers to more objectively justify the standard to apply for each exposure location.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Down to Earth Conference (DTEC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Down to Earth Conference (DTEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DTEC.2016.7731280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Down to Earth Conference (DTEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DTEC.2016.7731280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了冲击安全标准的生理基础,以及澳大利亚和其他国家如何重新调整先前相互冲突的模糊标准,使用量化风险分析来计算死亡风险作为新的设计度量。虽然简单的1欧姆电网电阻可能是一个足够的设计目标(即使对于具有50kA接地故障水平的变电站,只要电力电缆系统完好无损),但人们普遍认为,可容忍的接触电压是更合适的安全标准度量。然而,与来自13个国家的100多名工程师的讨论表明,有各种各样的方法,从标准模板配置的全面应用(独立于边界条件和方法适用性检查)到单独设计和委托安装。新的基于风险的设计度量使设计人员能够更客观地证明适用于每个暴露位置的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Earthing shock safety design standards
This paper examines the physiological basis for shock safety standards, and how previously conflicting ambiguous standards are being re-aligned in Australia and other countries, using quantified risk analysis to calculate risk of fatality as the new design metric. While a simple one ohm grid resistance may be an adequate design target (even for a substation with a 50kA earth fault level, provided the power cable systems are intact), it has been universally recognised that tolerable touch voltages are a more appropriate metric for safety standards. However, discussions with over 100 engineers from 13 countries have shown that there is a large variety in approaches, ranging from blanket application of standard template configurations (independent of boundary conditions and approach applicability checks) to individually designed and commissioned installations. The new risk based design metric enables designers to more objectively justify the standard to apply for each exposure location.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信