在集成的多学科自动化工作流程中使用4D地震进行历史匹配

T. Taha, P. Ward, G. Peacock, R. Bordas, U. Aslam, S. Walsh, R. Hammersley, E. Gringarten
{"title":"在集成的多学科自动化工作流程中使用4D地震进行历史匹配","authors":"T. Taha, P. Ward, G. Peacock, R. Bordas, U. Aslam, S. Walsh, R. Hammersley, E. Gringarten","doi":"10.2118/196680-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a case study in 4D seismic history matching using an automated, ensemble-based workflow that tightly integrates the static and dynamic domains. Subsurface uncertainties, captured at every stage of the interpretative and modelling process, are used as inputs within a repeatable workflow. By adjusting these inputs, an ensemble of models is created, and their likelihoods constrained by observations within an iterative loop. The result is multiple realizations of calibrated models that are consistent with the underlying geology, the observed production data, the seismic signature of the reservoir and its fluids. It is effectively a digital twin of the reservoir with an improved predictive ability that provides a realistic assessment of uncertainty associated with production forecasts.\n The example used in this study is a synthetic 3D model mimicking a real North Sea field. Data assimilation is conducted using an Ensemble Smoother with multiple data assimilations (ES-MDA). This paper has a significant focus on seismic data, with the corresponding result vector generated via a petro-elastic model. 4D seismic data proves to be a key additional source of measurement data with a unique volumetric distribution creating a coherent predictive model. This allows recovery of the underlying geological features and more accurately models the uncertainty in predicted production than was possible by matching production data alone.\n A significant advantage of this approach is the ability to utilize simultaneously multiple types of measurement data including production, RFT, PLT and 4D seismic. Newly acquired observations can be rapidly accommodated which is often critical as the value of most interventions is reduced by delay.","PeriodicalId":354509,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, September 19, 2019","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History Matching Using 4D Seismic in an Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Automated Workflow\",\"authors\":\"T. Taha, P. Ward, G. Peacock, R. Bordas, U. Aslam, S. Walsh, R. Hammersley, E. Gringarten\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/196680-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents a case study in 4D seismic history matching using an automated, ensemble-based workflow that tightly integrates the static and dynamic domains. Subsurface uncertainties, captured at every stage of the interpretative and modelling process, are used as inputs within a repeatable workflow. By adjusting these inputs, an ensemble of models is created, and their likelihoods constrained by observations within an iterative loop. The result is multiple realizations of calibrated models that are consistent with the underlying geology, the observed production data, the seismic signature of the reservoir and its fluids. It is effectively a digital twin of the reservoir with an improved predictive ability that provides a realistic assessment of uncertainty associated with production forecasts.\\n The example used in this study is a synthetic 3D model mimicking a real North Sea field. Data assimilation is conducted using an Ensemble Smoother with multiple data assimilations (ES-MDA). This paper has a significant focus on seismic data, with the corresponding result vector generated via a petro-elastic model. 4D seismic data proves to be a key additional source of measurement data with a unique volumetric distribution creating a coherent predictive model. This allows recovery of the underlying geological features and more accurately models the uncertainty in predicted production than was possible by matching production data alone.\\n A significant advantage of this approach is the ability to utilize simultaneously multiple types of measurement data including production, RFT, PLT and 4D seismic. Newly acquired observations can be rapidly accommodated which is often critical as the value of most interventions is reduced by delay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, September 19, 2019\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, September 19, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/196680-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, September 19, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196680-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文介绍了一个使用自动化、基于集成的工作流程进行四维地震历史匹配的案例研究,该工作流程紧密集成了静态和动态域。在解释和建模过程的每个阶段捕获的地下不确定性被用作可重复工作流程中的输入。通过调整这些输入,可以创建一个模型集合,并且它们的可能性受到迭代循环中的观察结果的约束。其结果是校准模型的多重实现,这些模型与下伏地质、观测到的生产数据、储层及其流体的地震特征相一致。它实际上是油藏的数字孪生体,具有改进的预测能力,可以对与产量预测相关的不确定性进行现实评估。本研究中使用的例子是一个模拟真实北海油田的合成3D模型。采用多数据同化集成平滑器(ES-MDA)进行数据同化。本文主要关注地震数据,并通过石油弹性模型生成相应的结果向量。事实证明,四维地震数据是测量数据的重要额外来源,具有独特的体积分布,可以创建连贯的预测模型。这可以恢复潜在的地质特征,并且比单独匹配生产数据更准确地模拟预测产量的不确定性。该方法的一个显著优势是能够同时利用多种类型的测量数据,包括生产、RFT、PLT和4D地震。新获得的观察结果可以迅速适应,这往往是至关重要的,因为大多数干预措施的价值因延迟而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
History Matching Using 4D Seismic in an Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Automated Workflow
This paper presents a case study in 4D seismic history matching using an automated, ensemble-based workflow that tightly integrates the static and dynamic domains. Subsurface uncertainties, captured at every stage of the interpretative and modelling process, are used as inputs within a repeatable workflow. By adjusting these inputs, an ensemble of models is created, and their likelihoods constrained by observations within an iterative loop. The result is multiple realizations of calibrated models that are consistent with the underlying geology, the observed production data, the seismic signature of the reservoir and its fluids. It is effectively a digital twin of the reservoir with an improved predictive ability that provides a realistic assessment of uncertainty associated with production forecasts. The example used in this study is a synthetic 3D model mimicking a real North Sea field. Data assimilation is conducted using an Ensemble Smoother with multiple data assimilations (ES-MDA). This paper has a significant focus on seismic data, with the corresponding result vector generated via a petro-elastic model. 4D seismic data proves to be a key additional source of measurement data with a unique volumetric distribution creating a coherent predictive model. This allows recovery of the underlying geological features and more accurately models the uncertainty in predicted production than was possible by matching production data alone. A significant advantage of this approach is the ability to utilize simultaneously multiple types of measurement data including production, RFT, PLT and 4D seismic. Newly acquired observations can be rapidly accommodated which is often critical as the value of most interventions is reduced by delay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信