澳大利亚新南威尔士州职业治疗临床医生对集体谈判的态度

S. Griffin
{"title":"澳大利亚新南威尔士州职业治疗临床医生对集体谈判的态度","authors":"S. Griffin","doi":"10.2190/BE05-EGB8-EUCW-EXQ6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the results of an investigation of the attitudes of New South Wales occupational therapy clinicians toward collective bargaining for themselves and occupational therapy academics. Data were collected using a mailed survey instrument that included scales measuring attitudes toward collective bargaining and collecting demographic data. New South Wales clinicians are supportive of collective bargaining in general for both them­ selves and academic occupational therapists. They are, however, not sup­ portive of strike action for themselves even over serious professional issues. Level of education was found to correlate with scores on the clinical collec­ tive bargaining subscale. The decrease in health care dollars in the Australian public health sector is having, and will continue to have, a marked impact on the delivery of occupational therapy (OT) services [1]. Occupational therapy authors have called on the profes­ sion to become more politically active within the health care sector to maximize their influence over decision makers and secure the position of the profession within the public sector [2, 3]. The restructuring of the public health care system in the state of New South Wales has resulted in various levels of representation across sections of the system. The level of representation achieved has depended on the extent to which occupational therapists, in conjunction with other allied health professionals, have been able to push for management structures within their areas to ensure they are •This research was supported by a grant from the Occupational Therapists' Vocational Branch of the NSW Public Service Association.","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Therapy Clinicians' Attitudes Toward Collective Bargaining in New South Wales, Australia\",\"authors\":\"S. Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/BE05-EGB8-EUCW-EXQ6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the results of an investigation of the attitudes of New South Wales occupational therapy clinicians toward collective bargaining for themselves and occupational therapy academics. Data were collected using a mailed survey instrument that included scales measuring attitudes toward collective bargaining and collecting demographic data. New South Wales clinicians are supportive of collective bargaining in general for both them­ selves and academic occupational therapists. They are, however, not sup­ portive of strike action for themselves even over serious professional issues. Level of education was found to correlate with scores on the clinical collec­ tive bargaining subscale. The decrease in health care dollars in the Australian public health sector is having, and will continue to have, a marked impact on the delivery of occupational therapy (OT) services [1]. Occupational therapy authors have called on the profes­ sion to become more politically active within the health care sector to maximize their influence over decision makers and secure the position of the profession within the public sector [2, 3]. The restructuring of the public health care system in the state of New South Wales has resulted in various levels of representation across sections of the system. The level of representation achieved has depended on the extent to which occupational therapists, in conjunction with other allied health professionals, have been able to push for management structures within their areas to ensure they are •This research was supported by a grant from the Occupational Therapists' Vocational Branch of the NSW Public Service Association.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/BE05-EGB8-EUCW-EXQ6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/BE05-EGB8-EUCW-EXQ6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了新南威尔士州职业治疗临床医生对集体谈判为自己和职业治疗学者的态度的调查结果。数据是通过邮寄调查工具收集的,包括测量对集体谈判态度的量表和收集人口统计数据。总的来说,新南威尔士州的临床医生对他们自己和学术职业治疗师都支持集体谈判。然而,即使是在严重的专业问题上,他们也不支持罢工行动。受教育程度与临床集体谈判量表的得分有关。澳大利亚公共卫生部门保健费用的减少正在并将继续对职业治疗服务的提供产生显著影响。职业治疗的作者呼吁该职业在医疗保健部门中变得更加政治活跃,以最大限度地发挥他们对决策者的影响,并确保该职业在公共部门中的地位[2,3]。新南威尔士州公共卫生保健系统的重组导致了该系统各部门不同程度的代表性。所取得的代表性水平取决于职业治疗师与其他专职卫生专业人员在多大程度上能够推动其领域内的管理结构,以确保他们是。•本研究得到了新南威尔士州公共服务协会职业治疗师职业分会的资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational Therapy Clinicians' Attitudes Toward Collective Bargaining in New South Wales, Australia
This article presents the results of an investigation of the attitudes of New South Wales occupational therapy clinicians toward collective bargaining for themselves and occupational therapy academics. Data were collected using a mailed survey instrument that included scales measuring attitudes toward collective bargaining and collecting demographic data. New South Wales clinicians are supportive of collective bargaining in general for both them­ selves and academic occupational therapists. They are, however, not sup­ portive of strike action for themselves even over serious professional issues. Level of education was found to correlate with scores on the clinical collec­ tive bargaining subscale. The decrease in health care dollars in the Australian public health sector is having, and will continue to have, a marked impact on the delivery of occupational therapy (OT) services [1]. Occupational therapy authors have called on the profes­ sion to become more politically active within the health care sector to maximize their influence over decision makers and secure the position of the profession within the public sector [2, 3]. The restructuring of the public health care system in the state of New South Wales has resulted in various levels of representation across sections of the system. The level of representation achieved has depended on the extent to which occupational therapists, in conjunction with other allied health professionals, have been able to push for management structures within their areas to ensure they are •This research was supported by a grant from the Occupational Therapists' Vocational Branch of the NSW Public Service Association.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信