架起新旧制度经济学的桥梁?

J. Groenewegen
{"title":"架起新旧制度经济学的桥梁?","authors":"J. Groenewegen","doi":"10.4337/9781785365003.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geoff Hodgson’s long-standing critique of the methodological individualism characteristic of both the mainstream and the new institutional economics revolves around the view that the economy is an open, evolving system in which actors and structures are mutually constituted. This position was instrumental in the formation of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy in 1988. It also runs through Hodgson’s defence of the habit-based conception of agency characteristic of the original institutional economics and his proposals of various non-efficiency explanations of the firm. The chapter shows that the boundaries between the original and the new institutional economics have more recently become blurred, to the point that it is no longer useful to differentiate between the two. Institutional economics can be usefully seen as belonging to a continuum along which different schools of thought are more complements than substitutes. This opens the door for multiple opportunities for mutual learning.","PeriodicalId":290188,"journal":{"name":"Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Original and New Institutional Economics?\",\"authors\":\"J. Groenewegen\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781785365003.00016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Geoff Hodgson’s long-standing critique of the methodological individualism characteristic of both the mainstream and the new institutional economics revolves around the view that the economy is an open, evolving system in which actors and structures are mutually constituted. This position was instrumental in the formation of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy in 1988. It also runs through Hodgson’s defence of the habit-based conception of agency characteristic of the original institutional economics and his proposals of various non-efficiency explanations of the firm. The chapter shows that the boundaries between the original and the new institutional economics have more recently become blurred, to the point that it is no longer useful to differentiate between the two. Institutional economics can be usefully seen as belonging to a continuum along which different schools of thought are more complements than substitutes. This opens the door for multiple opportunities for mutual learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":290188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365003.00016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365003.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

杰夫·霍奇森(Geoff hodgson)长期以来对主流经济学和新制度经济学的方法论个人主义的批判围绕着这样一种观点,即经济是一个开放的、不断发展的系统,在这个系统中,行动者和结构是相互构成的。这一立场对1988年欧洲进化政治经济学协会的成立起到了重要作用。这也贯穿了霍奇森对原始制度经济学中以习惯为基础的代理概念的辩护,以及他对企业的各种非效率解释的建议。本章表明,原始制度经济学和新制度经济学之间的界限最近变得模糊,以至于区分两者不再有用。制度经济学可以被看作是一个连续体,在这个连续体中,不同的思想流派与其说是替代,不如说是互补。这为相互学习提供了多种机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging Original and New Institutional Economics?
Geoff Hodgson’s long-standing critique of the methodological individualism characteristic of both the mainstream and the new institutional economics revolves around the view that the economy is an open, evolving system in which actors and structures are mutually constituted. This position was instrumental in the formation of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy in 1988. It also runs through Hodgson’s defence of the habit-based conception of agency characteristic of the original institutional economics and his proposals of various non-efficiency explanations of the firm. The chapter shows that the boundaries between the original and the new institutional economics have more recently become blurred, to the point that it is no longer useful to differentiate between the two. Institutional economics can be usefully seen as belonging to a continuum along which different schools of thought are more complements than substitutes. This opens the door for multiple opportunities for mutual learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信