三相感应电动机负载评估方法的比较研究

K. B. Melo, M. V. G. Reis, Michelle Kitayama da Silva, M. G. Villalva, Rubem César Rodrigues Souza
{"title":"三相感应电动机负载评估方法的比较研究","authors":"K. B. Melo, M. V. G. Reis, Michelle Kitayama da Silva, M. G. Villalva, Rubem César Rodrigues Souza","doi":"10.1109/INDUSCON.2018.8627281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several methods for evaluating the loading condition of three phase induction motors (TPIMs). This evaluation allows inferring about the technical feasibility of replacing the motor in use by another one of less power, contributing to the efficient use of electric energy. The work presented in this document consisted of a comparative evaluation of the Linearization (LM) and Characteristic Curves (CCM) methods; as well as those used by the software BD Motor and MarkIV Plus. The results obtained with the application of the methods were compared with reference values, which were acquired through laboratory tests of the TPIM. In the laboratory tests, a computerized bench consisting of a TPIM and a dynamometer was used. Finally, the methods were compared to each other, leading to the conclusion that the method with the best precision is the CCM, followed by the current method used in MarkIV Plus software. However, the latter uses more accessible information than the required by the CCM.","PeriodicalId":156866,"journal":{"name":"2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Methods to Evaluate Three Phase Induction Motors Loading\",\"authors\":\"K. B. Melo, M. V. G. Reis, Michelle Kitayama da Silva, M. G. Villalva, Rubem César Rodrigues Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INDUSCON.2018.8627281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are several methods for evaluating the loading condition of three phase induction motors (TPIMs). This evaluation allows inferring about the technical feasibility of replacing the motor in use by another one of less power, contributing to the efficient use of electric energy. The work presented in this document consisted of a comparative evaluation of the Linearization (LM) and Characteristic Curves (CCM) methods; as well as those used by the software BD Motor and MarkIV Plus. The results obtained with the application of the methods were compared with reference values, which were acquired through laboratory tests of the TPIM. In the laboratory tests, a computerized bench consisting of a TPIM and a dynamometer was used. Finally, the methods were compared to each other, leading to the conclusion that the method with the best precision is the CCM, followed by the current method used in MarkIV Plus software. However, the latter uses more accessible information than the required by the CCM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDUSCON.2018.8627281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDUSCON.2018.8627281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估三相异步电动机负载状态的方法有很多种。这个评估可以推断用另一个功率较小的电机替换正在使用的电机的技术可行性,有助于有效利用电能。本文介绍的工作包括对线性化(LM)和特征曲线(CCM)方法的比较评估;以及软件BD Motor和MarkIV Plus使用的那些。应用该方法得到的结果与实验室TPIM试验得到的参考值进行了比较。在实验室测试中,使用了由TPIM和测功机组成的电脑化工作台。最后,对两种方法进行了比较,得出精度最好的方法是CCM方法,其次是MarkIV Plus软件中目前使用的方法。但是,后者使用的可访问信息比CCM所要求的更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Methods to Evaluate Three Phase Induction Motors Loading
There are several methods for evaluating the loading condition of three phase induction motors (TPIMs). This evaluation allows inferring about the technical feasibility of replacing the motor in use by another one of less power, contributing to the efficient use of electric energy. The work presented in this document consisted of a comparative evaluation of the Linearization (LM) and Characteristic Curves (CCM) methods; as well as those used by the software BD Motor and MarkIV Plus. The results obtained with the application of the methods were compared with reference values, which were acquired through laboratory tests of the TPIM. In the laboratory tests, a computerized bench consisting of a TPIM and a dynamometer was used. Finally, the methods were compared to each other, leading to the conclusion that the method with the best precision is the CCM, followed by the current method used in MarkIV Plus software. However, the latter uses more accessible information than the required by the CCM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信