第十一章破产与贷款契约

Garence Staraci, Meradj Pouraghdam
{"title":"第十一章破产与贷款契约","authors":"Garence Staraci, Meradj Pouraghdam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2996235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a new determinant of covenant strictness in syndicated loan contracts: the degree of creditor friendliness of Chapter 11 bankruptcy practices. This new channel dictates that the more debtor(creditor)-friendly the bankruptcy practice is, the more creditors will seek to increase(decrease) their level of loan monitoring outside of bankruptcy through an adjustment in covenant strictness. Borrowers would agree on stricter covenants in exchange for a lower loan spread, and vice-versa. We first theoretically illustrate our claim by providing a framework linking creditor control inside and outside of bankruptcy. We next empirically show that judicial discretion is the primary driver of bankruptcy outcomes. This finding allows us to use several debtor or creditor-friendly Chapter 11 bankruptcy practice proxies as instruments in order to test our channel, with a focus on the U.S. manufacturing sector. Using both covenant tightness and covenant intensity as proxies for covenant strictness, we show that our legal channel not only impacts covenant strictness but also ultimately accounts for a significant fraction of the total cost of credit.","PeriodicalId":309706,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and Loan Covenant Strictness\",\"authors\":\"Garence Staraci, Meradj Pouraghdam\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2996235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a new determinant of covenant strictness in syndicated loan contracts: the degree of creditor friendliness of Chapter 11 bankruptcy practices. This new channel dictates that the more debtor(creditor)-friendly the bankruptcy practice is, the more creditors will seek to increase(decrease) their level of loan monitoring outside of bankruptcy through an adjustment in covenant strictness. Borrowers would agree on stricter covenants in exchange for a lower loan spread, and vice-versa. We first theoretically illustrate our claim by providing a framework linking creditor control inside and outside of bankruptcy. We next empirically show that judicial discretion is the primary driver of bankruptcy outcomes. This finding allows us to use several debtor or creditor-friendly Chapter 11 bankruptcy practice proxies as instruments in order to test our channel, with a focus on the U.S. manufacturing sector. Using both covenant tightness and covenant intensity as proxies for covenant strictness, we show that our legal channel not only impacts covenant strictness but also ultimately accounts for a significant fraction of the total cost of credit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2996235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2996235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了银团贷款合同契约严格性的一个新的决定因素:第11章破产实践的债权人友好程度。这一新渠道表明,破产做法对债务人(债权人)越友好,债权人就越会寻求通过调整契约的严格程度来提高(降低)破产之外的贷款监测水平。借款人将同意更严格的契约,以换取更低的贷款利差,反之亦然。我们首先从理论上说明我们的主张,提供一个框架,将债权人控制内部和外部的破产。我们接下来的实证研究表明,司法自由裁量权是破产结果的主要驱动因素。这一发现使我们能够使用几个债务人或债权人友好的第11章破产实践代理作为工具,以测试我们的渠道,重点是美国制造业。使用契约严密性和契约强度作为契约严密性的代表,我们表明我们的法律渠道不仅影响契约严密性,而且最终占信贷总成本的很大一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and Loan Covenant Strictness
We propose a new determinant of covenant strictness in syndicated loan contracts: the degree of creditor friendliness of Chapter 11 bankruptcy practices. This new channel dictates that the more debtor(creditor)-friendly the bankruptcy practice is, the more creditors will seek to increase(decrease) their level of loan monitoring outside of bankruptcy through an adjustment in covenant strictness. Borrowers would agree on stricter covenants in exchange for a lower loan spread, and vice-versa. We first theoretically illustrate our claim by providing a framework linking creditor control inside and outside of bankruptcy. We next empirically show that judicial discretion is the primary driver of bankruptcy outcomes. This finding allows us to use several debtor or creditor-friendly Chapter 11 bankruptcy practice proxies as instruments in order to test our channel, with a focus on the U.S. manufacturing sector. Using both covenant tightness and covenant intensity as proxies for covenant strictness, we show that our legal channel not only impacts covenant strictness but also ultimately accounts for a significant fraction of the total cost of credit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信