收益最大化与产品排名学习

Ningyuan Chen, Anran Li, Shuoguang Yang
{"title":"收益最大化与产品排名学习","authors":"Ningyuan Chen, Anran Li, Shuoguang Yang","doi":"10.1145/3465456.3467610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online retailing has seen steady growth over the last decade. According to the Digital Commerce (formerly Internet Retailer) analysis of the US Commerce Department's year-end retail data, online sales constituted 16% of all retail sales in 2019, and is forecast to reach higher levels in the next years due to the impact of COVID-19. For an online retailer, one of the most important decisions is the products' display positioning as it plays a crucial role in shaping customers' shopping behavior. Empirical evidence abounds. Baye et al. [2] find that a consumer's likelihood of purchasing from a firm is strongly related to the order in which the firm is listed on a webpage by a search engine. In the online advertising industry, it has been widely observed that ads placed higher on a webpage attract more clicks from consumers [1]. Given the importance of product ranking positions, the key question for online retailers is how to rank the products to maximize the revenue. The question cannot be answered definitively, unless we can characterize and quantify how exactly customers react to products ranked in different positions. There are a number of reasons to explain the so-called position bias. The first reason is the limited attention of consumers. Eyetracking experiments show that the users are less likely to examine results near the bottom of the list. Besides limited attention, a customer seems to be more likely to buy a product ranked at the top, even though there is another similar product below inside her attention span. What explains this phenomenon at the individual level? Craswell et al. [3] provide a second explanation to the position bias using experiments, which is related to the satisficing behavior of customers. In particular, the customer views product sequentially and directly proceeds to purchasing a product once the utility of the product exceeds an acceptable threshold. The remaining products in the attention span are thus never viewed. Thus, positioning a brand or product at a top position on a list can improve both consumer attention and consumer selection of the brand.","PeriodicalId":395676,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revenue Maximization and Learning in Products Ranking\",\"authors\":\"Ningyuan Chen, Anran Li, Shuoguang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3465456.3467610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online retailing has seen steady growth over the last decade. According to the Digital Commerce (formerly Internet Retailer) analysis of the US Commerce Department's year-end retail data, online sales constituted 16% of all retail sales in 2019, and is forecast to reach higher levels in the next years due to the impact of COVID-19. For an online retailer, one of the most important decisions is the products' display positioning as it plays a crucial role in shaping customers' shopping behavior. Empirical evidence abounds. Baye et al. [2] find that a consumer's likelihood of purchasing from a firm is strongly related to the order in which the firm is listed on a webpage by a search engine. In the online advertising industry, it has been widely observed that ads placed higher on a webpage attract more clicks from consumers [1]. Given the importance of product ranking positions, the key question for online retailers is how to rank the products to maximize the revenue. The question cannot be answered definitively, unless we can characterize and quantify how exactly customers react to products ranked in different positions. There are a number of reasons to explain the so-called position bias. The first reason is the limited attention of consumers. Eyetracking experiments show that the users are less likely to examine results near the bottom of the list. Besides limited attention, a customer seems to be more likely to buy a product ranked at the top, even though there is another similar product below inside her attention span. What explains this phenomenon at the individual level? Craswell et al. [3] provide a second explanation to the position bias using experiments, which is related to the satisficing behavior of customers. In particular, the customer views product sequentially and directly proceeds to purchasing a product once the utility of the product exceeds an acceptable threshold. The remaining products in the attention span are thus never viewed. Thus, positioning a brand or product at a top position on a list can improve both consumer attention and consumer selection of the brand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465456.3467610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465456.3467610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在线零售在过去十年中稳步增长。根据数字商务(以前的互联网零售商)对美国商务部年终零售数据的分析,2019年在线销售额占所有零售额的16%,预计由于COVID-19的影响,未来几年将达到更高的水平。对于在线零售商来说,最重要的决策之一是产品的展示定位,因为它在塑造顾客的购物行为方面起着至关重要的作用。经验证据比比皆是。Baye等人[2]发现,消费者从一家企业购买的可能性与搜索引擎在网页上列出该企业的顺序密切相关。在网络广告行业,人们普遍发现,在网页上放置位置越高的广告,消费者的点击量越大[1]。考虑到产品排名位置的重要性,在线零售商面临的关键问题是如何对产品进行排名以实现收入最大化。这个问题无法得到明确的回答,除非我们能够描述和量化客户对排名不同位置的产品的确切反应。有很多原因可以解释所谓的立场偏见。第一个原因是消费者的注意力有限。眼球追踪实验表明,用户不太可能查看列表底部附近的结果。除了注意力有限之外,顾客似乎更有可能购买排名靠前的产品,即使在她的注意力范围内还有另一个类似的产品。在个人层面上如何解释这种现象?Craswell等[3]通过实验对位置偏差提供了第二种解释,它与顾客的满意行为有关。特别是,一旦产品的效用超过可接受的阈值,客户就会按顺序查看产品,并直接进行购买。因此,注意力范围内的其他产品永远不会被浏览。因此,将品牌或产品定位在列表的顶部位置可以提高消费者对品牌的关注和选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revenue Maximization and Learning in Products Ranking
Online retailing has seen steady growth over the last decade. According to the Digital Commerce (formerly Internet Retailer) analysis of the US Commerce Department's year-end retail data, online sales constituted 16% of all retail sales in 2019, and is forecast to reach higher levels in the next years due to the impact of COVID-19. For an online retailer, one of the most important decisions is the products' display positioning as it plays a crucial role in shaping customers' shopping behavior. Empirical evidence abounds. Baye et al. [2] find that a consumer's likelihood of purchasing from a firm is strongly related to the order in which the firm is listed on a webpage by a search engine. In the online advertising industry, it has been widely observed that ads placed higher on a webpage attract more clicks from consumers [1]. Given the importance of product ranking positions, the key question for online retailers is how to rank the products to maximize the revenue. The question cannot be answered definitively, unless we can characterize and quantify how exactly customers react to products ranked in different positions. There are a number of reasons to explain the so-called position bias. The first reason is the limited attention of consumers. Eyetracking experiments show that the users are less likely to examine results near the bottom of the list. Besides limited attention, a customer seems to be more likely to buy a product ranked at the top, even though there is another similar product below inside her attention span. What explains this phenomenon at the individual level? Craswell et al. [3] provide a second explanation to the position bias using experiments, which is related to the satisficing behavior of customers. In particular, the customer views product sequentially and directly proceeds to purchasing a product once the utility of the product exceeds an acceptable threshold. The remaining products in the attention span are thus never viewed. Thus, positioning a brand or product at a top position on a list can improve both consumer attention and consumer selection of the brand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信