{"title":"错过的turupukllay相遇:马克思主义,土著社区和亚瓦尔节中的安第斯文化","authors":"Gavin Arnall","doi":"10.14324/111.444.ra.2020.v5.1.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article takes as its point of departure a discussion of José María Arguedas’s engagement with Marxism, the ideas of José Carlos Mariátegui and the journal Amauta . It argues that Arguedas’s distance from official party politics should not be confused with an abandonment of politics as such. It also underscores Arguedas’s reflections on the relationship between lived experience, socialist theory and literary writing. This sets the stage for an exploration of a core problem in Arguedas’s oeuvre: the missed encounter between Marxist organisations and indigenous communities, which is to say, the failure to form an alliance between these groups based on mutual understanding and reciprocal enrichment. The article turns to Arguedas’s first major novel, Yawar Fiesta (1941), and traces its portrayal of such a missed encounter as it occurs around the celebration of turupukllay , an Andean translation of a Spanish bullfight that commemorates Peru’s independence from colonial rule. The wager of the article is that Yawar Fiesta ’s capacity to illuminate key contributing factors of the missed encounter enables Arguedas to advance an immanent critique, a critique of a certain tendency of Marxism from within Marxism itself, and that, as a result, the novel supplements socialist theory by simultaneously exposing its limits and enhancing its claims.","PeriodicalId":205578,"journal":{"name":"Radical Americas","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The missed encounter of turupukllay : Marxism, indigenous communities and Andean culture in Yawar Fiesta\",\"authors\":\"Gavin Arnall\",\"doi\":\"10.14324/111.444.ra.2020.v5.1.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article takes as its point of departure a discussion of José María Arguedas’s engagement with Marxism, the ideas of José Carlos Mariátegui and the journal Amauta . It argues that Arguedas’s distance from official party politics should not be confused with an abandonment of politics as such. It also underscores Arguedas’s reflections on the relationship between lived experience, socialist theory and literary writing. This sets the stage for an exploration of a core problem in Arguedas’s oeuvre: the missed encounter between Marxist organisations and indigenous communities, which is to say, the failure to form an alliance between these groups based on mutual understanding and reciprocal enrichment. The article turns to Arguedas’s first major novel, Yawar Fiesta (1941), and traces its portrayal of such a missed encounter as it occurs around the celebration of turupukllay , an Andean translation of a Spanish bullfight that commemorates Peru’s independence from colonial rule. The wager of the article is that Yawar Fiesta ’s capacity to illuminate key contributing factors of the missed encounter enables Arguedas to advance an immanent critique, a critique of a certain tendency of Marxism from within Marxism itself, and that, as a result, the novel supplements socialist theory by simultaneously exposing its limits and enhancing its claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radical Americas\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radical Americas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ra.2020.v5.1.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radical Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ra.2020.v5.1.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文以讨论joses María Arguedas与马克思主义的接触、joses Carlos Mariátegui的思想和《Amauta》杂志为出发点。它认为,阿格达斯与官方政党政治的距离不应与放弃政治本身相混淆。这也凸显了阿格达斯对生活经验、社会主义理论和文学创作之间关系的思考。这为探索阿格达斯作品中的一个核心问题奠定了基础:马克思主义组织与土著社区之间错过的相遇,也就是说,未能在这些群体之间形成基于相互理解和互惠丰富的联盟。这篇文章转向阿格达斯的第一部重要小说《亚瓦尔嘉年华》(1941),追溯了书中对这一错过的相遇的描述,因为它发生在turupukllay的庆祝活动期间。turupukllay是安第斯语对西班牙斗牛的翻译,是为了纪念秘鲁从殖民统治下的独立。这篇文章的赌注是,亚瓦尔·菲斯塔阐明错过的相遇的关键促成因素的能力,使阿格达斯能够提出一种内在的批评,一种从马克思主义本身内部对马克思主义的某种倾向的批评,因此,小说通过同时暴露其局限性并增强其主张来补充社会主义理论。
The missed encounter of turupukllay : Marxism, indigenous communities and Andean culture in Yawar Fiesta
This article takes as its point of departure a discussion of José María Arguedas’s engagement with Marxism, the ideas of José Carlos Mariátegui and the journal Amauta . It argues that Arguedas’s distance from official party politics should not be confused with an abandonment of politics as such. It also underscores Arguedas’s reflections on the relationship between lived experience, socialist theory and literary writing. This sets the stage for an exploration of a core problem in Arguedas’s oeuvre: the missed encounter between Marxist organisations and indigenous communities, which is to say, the failure to form an alliance between these groups based on mutual understanding and reciprocal enrichment. The article turns to Arguedas’s first major novel, Yawar Fiesta (1941), and traces its portrayal of such a missed encounter as it occurs around the celebration of turupukllay , an Andean translation of a Spanish bullfight that commemorates Peru’s independence from colonial rule. The wager of the article is that Yawar Fiesta ’s capacity to illuminate key contributing factors of the missed encounter enables Arguedas to advance an immanent critique, a critique of a certain tendency of Marxism from within Marxism itself, and that, as a result, the novel supplements socialist theory by simultaneously exposing its limits and enhancing its claims.