性犯罪与法庭已经了结

Victoria Brooks
{"title":"性犯罪与法庭已经了结","authors":"Victoria Brooks","doi":"10.4337/9781788977203.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The courtroom is a space filled with judgments that last a lifetime. In sexual offences cases, this judgment might take the form of disbelief in a case relating to rape, inability to express the kind of harm caused, or being face to face with an offender. It could be the loss of liberty, or a life of trauma. With the feminist and spatial turn and relatively new understandings of law’s relationship with space, is it possible to imagine a ‘spatially just’ sexual offences trial built for the bodies of all genders, races and sexualities that must use the courtroom? Despite critical legal thinking’s theoretical achievements in arguing for the Deleuzian ‘doing away’ with authoritarian judgment, the #MeToo era now demands that this task is achieved practically and spatially. This chapter finds that ‘doing away’ with judgment in this context means destruction of the courtroom in favour of a radical new architecture.","PeriodicalId":119389,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Space, Place and Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual offences and to have done with the courtroom\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781788977203.00016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The courtroom is a space filled with judgments that last a lifetime. In sexual offences cases, this judgment might take the form of disbelief in a case relating to rape, inability to express the kind of harm caused, or being face to face with an offender. It could be the loss of liberty, or a life of trauma. With the feminist and spatial turn and relatively new understandings of law’s relationship with space, is it possible to imagine a ‘spatially just’ sexual offences trial built for the bodies of all genders, races and sexualities that must use the courtroom? Despite critical legal thinking’s theoretical achievements in arguing for the Deleuzian ‘doing away’ with authoritarian judgment, the #MeToo era now demands that this task is achieved practically and spatially. This chapter finds that ‘doing away’ with judgment in this context means destruction of the courtroom in favour of a radical new architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook on Space, Place and Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook on Space, Place and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977203.00016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on Space, Place and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977203.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法庭是一个充满了影响一生的判决的地方。在性犯罪案件中,这种判决的形式可能是不相信与强奸有关的案件,无法表达所造成的伤害,或与罪犯面对面。这可能是自由的丧失,也可能是人生的创伤。随着女权主义和空间的转向,以及对法律与空间关系的相对较新的理解,是否有可能想象一个“空间公正”的性犯罪审判,为所有性别、种族和性取向的身体而建,必须使用法庭?尽管批判性法律思维在主张德勒兹式的“废除”专制审判方面取得了理论成就,但#MeToo时代现在要求在实践和空间上实现这一任务。本章发现,在这种情况下,“废除”审判意味着为了支持一种激进的新架构而摧毁法庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sexual offences and to have done with the courtroom
The courtroom is a space filled with judgments that last a lifetime. In sexual offences cases, this judgment might take the form of disbelief in a case relating to rape, inability to express the kind of harm caused, or being face to face with an offender. It could be the loss of liberty, or a life of trauma. With the feminist and spatial turn and relatively new understandings of law’s relationship with space, is it possible to imagine a ‘spatially just’ sexual offences trial built for the bodies of all genders, races and sexualities that must use the courtroom? Despite critical legal thinking’s theoretical achievements in arguing for the Deleuzian ‘doing away’ with authoritarian judgment, the #MeToo era now demands that this task is achieved practically and spatially. This chapter finds that ‘doing away’ with judgment in this context means destruction of the courtroom in favour of a radical new architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信