{"title":"4C海底地震资料弹性全波形反演:模式参数化分析","authors":"Jianying Cao, R. Brossier, L. Métivier","doi":"10.1190/image2022-3751342.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Full waveform inversion (FWI), as an efficient seismic imaging tool, is widely used in the investigation of the structure of the Earth. For the oil & gas industry, in addition to the subsurface image, a quantitative estimation of elastic properties from seismic data is crucial for the geophysical characterization and monitoring of the subsurface lithol-ogy and reservoirs. In marine surveys, with the emergence of the four-component (4C) ocean-bottom acquisition systems (deploying 1C hydrophone plus 3C geophone on the seabed), more elastic wave propagation effects can be recorded in the seismic data for an elastic property estimation of the subsurface, i.e. extracting medium shear modulus from the S-wave velocity model. Multi-parameter elastic FWI offers the possibility to reconstruct the P-wave ( V p ) and S-wave velocity ( V s ) models jointly. However, compared with the mono-parameter acoustic FWI, the multi-parameter elastic FWI can be more vulnerable due to the parameter coupling, wave modes conversion and interference. For the purpose of building a robust multi-parameter elastic inversion of the 4C seismic data, we consider a workflow design from the aspect of model parameterization analysis. Three different elastic model parameterizations, m 1 = ( V p , V s ) , m 2 = ( V p , V p / V s ) and m 3 = ( V p , σ ) ( σ is the Poisson’s ratio), are analysed in terms of data sensitivity and model gradient feature. Together with synthetic case studies on a series of overburden models with increasing elastic effects and a realistic geological model, we conclude that a workflow of first inverting hydrophone data with ( V p , V p / V s ) parameterization and then 3C geophone data with ( V p , V s ) parameterization contributes to a robust and reliable V p and V s model reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":341517,"journal":{"name":"Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elastic full-waveform inversion of 4C ocean-bottom seismic data: Model parameterization analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jianying Cao, R. Brossier, L. Métivier\",\"doi\":\"10.1190/image2022-3751342.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY Full waveform inversion (FWI), as an efficient seismic imaging tool, is widely used in the investigation of the structure of the Earth. For the oil & gas industry, in addition to the subsurface image, a quantitative estimation of elastic properties from seismic data is crucial for the geophysical characterization and monitoring of the subsurface lithol-ogy and reservoirs. In marine surveys, with the emergence of the four-component (4C) ocean-bottom acquisition systems (deploying 1C hydrophone plus 3C geophone on the seabed), more elastic wave propagation effects can be recorded in the seismic data for an elastic property estimation of the subsurface, i.e. extracting medium shear modulus from the S-wave velocity model. Multi-parameter elastic FWI offers the possibility to reconstruct the P-wave ( V p ) and S-wave velocity ( V s ) models jointly. However, compared with the mono-parameter acoustic FWI, the multi-parameter elastic FWI can be more vulnerable due to the parameter coupling, wave modes conversion and interference. For the purpose of building a robust multi-parameter elastic inversion of the 4C seismic data, we consider a workflow design from the aspect of model parameterization analysis. Three different elastic model parameterizations, m 1 = ( V p , V s ) , m 2 = ( V p , V p / V s ) and m 3 = ( V p , σ ) ( σ is the Poisson’s ratio), are analysed in terms of data sensitivity and model gradient feature. Together with synthetic case studies on a series of overburden models with increasing elastic effects and a realistic geological model, we conclude that a workflow of first inverting hydrophone data with ( V p , V p / V s ) parameterization and then 3C geophone data with ( V p , V s ) parameterization contributes to a robust and reliable V p and V s model reconstruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3751342.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3751342.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
全波形反演作为一种高效的地震成像工具,在地球结构研究中得到了广泛的应用。对于油气行业来说,除了地下图像,从地震数据中定量估计弹性特性对于地下岩性和储层的地球物理表征和监测至关重要。在海洋勘探中,随着四分量(4C)海底采集系统的出现(在海底部署1C水听器和3C检波器),可以在地震数据中记录更多的弹性波传播效应,用于地下弹性特性估计,即从s波速度模型中提取介质剪切模量。多参数弹性wi提供了联合重建纵波(V p)和横波速度(V s)模型的可能性。然而,与单参数声学FWI相比,多参数弹性FWI由于参数耦合、波形转换和干扰等因素而更加脆弱。为建立稳健的4C地震资料多参数弹性反演方法,从模型参数化分析的角度考虑了工作流程设计。从数据敏感性和模型梯度特征方面分析了3种不同的弹性模型参数化,m1 = (vp, V s), m2 = (vp, V p / V s)和m3 = (vp, σ) (σ为泊松比)。结合一系列弹性效应增强覆盖层模型的综合实例研究和实际地质模型,得出先用(V p, V p / V s)参数化水听器数据反演,再用(V p, V s)参数化3C检波器数据反演的工作流程有助于稳健可靠的V p和V s模型重建。
Elastic full-waveform inversion of 4C ocean-bottom seismic data: Model parameterization analysis
SUMMARY Full waveform inversion (FWI), as an efficient seismic imaging tool, is widely used in the investigation of the structure of the Earth. For the oil & gas industry, in addition to the subsurface image, a quantitative estimation of elastic properties from seismic data is crucial for the geophysical characterization and monitoring of the subsurface lithol-ogy and reservoirs. In marine surveys, with the emergence of the four-component (4C) ocean-bottom acquisition systems (deploying 1C hydrophone plus 3C geophone on the seabed), more elastic wave propagation effects can be recorded in the seismic data for an elastic property estimation of the subsurface, i.e. extracting medium shear modulus from the S-wave velocity model. Multi-parameter elastic FWI offers the possibility to reconstruct the P-wave ( V p ) and S-wave velocity ( V s ) models jointly. However, compared with the mono-parameter acoustic FWI, the multi-parameter elastic FWI can be more vulnerable due to the parameter coupling, wave modes conversion and interference. For the purpose of building a robust multi-parameter elastic inversion of the 4C seismic data, we consider a workflow design from the aspect of model parameterization analysis. Three different elastic model parameterizations, m 1 = ( V p , V s ) , m 2 = ( V p , V p / V s ) and m 3 = ( V p , σ ) ( σ is the Poisson’s ratio), are analysed in terms of data sensitivity and model gradient feature. Together with synthetic case studies on a series of overburden models with increasing elastic effects and a realistic geological model, we conclude that a workflow of first inverting hydrophone data with ( V p , V p / V s ) parameterization and then 3C geophone data with ( V p , V s ) parameterization contributes to a robust and reliable V p and V s model reconstruction.