8. 专有的禁止反言

E. Lees
{"title":"8. 专有的禁止反言","authors":"E. Lees","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198810995.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses proprietary estoppel, which is one of the land law doctrines which allows for the creation of rights in land without a written contract or other formal document. It arises when a person (the promisor) makes a promise to another (the promisee) in relation to their land, and then attempts to go back on that promise in circumstances where it was unfair to do so. Given the general policy of formality, with its associated benefits of certainty and clarity, one must consider the rules relating to proprietary estoppel from the perspective not only of when proprietary estoppel generates rights in land, but also why it does so. This is particularly important in relation to estoppel since it represents a general and potentially broad exception to the formality rules discussed in the fourth chapter. There are three forms of proprietary estoppel: estoppel by representation, estoppel by acquiescence, and estoppel by assurance or promise. The chapter then discusses the consequences of estoppel arising in terms of remedies and effects on third parties. It also examines the relationship between estoppel and formalities, and estoppel and constructive trusts.","PeriodicalId":340642,"journal":{"name":"The Principles of Land Law","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"8. Proprietary Estoppel\",\"authors\":\"E. Lees\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/he/9780198810995.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter addresses proprietary estoppel, which is one of the land law doctrines which allows for the creation of rights in land without a written contract or other formal document. It arises when a person (the promisor) makes a promise to another (the promisee) in relation to their land, and then attempts to go back on that promise in circumstances where it was unfair to do so. Given the general policy of formality, with its associated benefits of certainty and clarity, one must consider the rules relating to proprietary estoppel from the perspective not only of when proprietary estoppel generates rights in land, but also why it does so. This is particularly important in relation to estoppel since it represents a general and potentially broad exception to the formality rules discussed in the fourth chapter. There are three forms of proprietary estoppel: estoppel by representation, estoppel by acquiescence, and estoppel by assurance or promise. The chapter then discusses the consequences of estoppel arising in terms of remedies and effects on third parties. It also examines the relationship between estoppel and formalities, and estoppel and constructive trusts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Principles of Land Law\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Principles of Land Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198810995.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Principles of Land Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198810995.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章讨论所有权禁止反悔,这是土地法理论之一,它允许在没有书面合同或其他正式文件的情况下在土地上创造权利。当一个人(承诺人)对另一个人(承诺人)就他们的土地做出承诺,然后在不公平的情况下试图违背承诺时,就会出现这种情况。考虑到一般形式政策及其相关的确定性和清晰度的好处,人们必须考虑与专有禁止反言有关的规则,不仅要从专有禁止反言何时产生土地权利的角度,还要从为什么这样做的角度考虑。这在禁止反悔方面尤其重要,因为它代表了第四章中讨论的形式规则的一般和潜在的广泛例外。专有禁止反言有三种形式:陈述禁止反言、默许禁止反言和保证或承诺禁止反言。然后,本章从救济和对第三方的影响方面讨论了禁止反悔所产生的后果。它还探讨了禁止反悔和手续,禁止反悔和建设性信托之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
8. Proprietary Estoppel
This chapter addresses proprietary estoppel, which is one of the land law doctrines which allows for the creation of rights in land without a written contract or other formal document. It arises when a person (the promisor) makes a promise to another (the promisee) in relation to their land, and then attempts to go back on that promise in circumstances where it was unfair to do so. Given the general policy of formality, with its associated benefits of certainty and clarity, one must consider the rules relating to proprietary estoppel from the perspective not only of when proprietary estoppel generates rights in land, but also why it does so. This is particularly important in relation to estoppel since it represents a general and potentially broad exception to the formality rules discussed in the fourth chapter. There are three forms of proprietary estoppel: estoppel by representation, estoppel by acquiescence, and estoppel by assurance or promise. The chapter then discusses the consequences of estoppel arising in terms of remedies and effects on third parties. It also examines the relationship between estoppel and formalities, and estoppel and constructive trusts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信