因果关系

Richard Corry
{"title":"因果关系","authors":"Richard Corry","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198840718.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter investigates the relation between an ontology of power and influence and the metaphysics of causation. A traditional approach to this task might involve an attempt to provide a conceptual analysis of causation in terms of power and influence, but that is not the approach taken here, for it is argued that there is no single concept of causation. Rather, following Ned Hall, the various concepts of causation are divided into two main camps, causation as production and causation as dependence. In both camps, it is shown, the characteristic features of causation can be generated by the existence of appropriate powers and influences, and questions about whether causation has occurred can be answered, in part, by looking at the arrangement of relevant powers and influences. Thus, it is argued that causation is grounded in structures of causal influence.","PeriodicalId":173983,"journal":{"name":"Power and Influence","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causation\",\"authors\":\"Richard Corry\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198840718.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter investigates the relation between an ontology of power and influence and the metaphysics of causation. A traditional approach to this task might involve an attempt to provide a conceptual analysis of causation in terms of power and influence, but that is not the approach taken here, for it is argued that there is no single concept of causation. Rather, following Ned Hall, the various concepts of causation are divided into two main camps, causation as production and causation as dependence. In both camps, it is shown, the characteristic features of causation can be generated by the existence of appropriate powers and influences, and questions about whether causation has occurred can be answered, in part, by looking at the arrangement of relevant powers and influences. Thus, it is argued that causation is grounded in structures of causal influence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Power and Influence\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Power and Influence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840718.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Influence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840718.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨权力和影响本体论与因果形而上学之间的关系。完成这项任务的传统方法可能涉及尝试从权力和影响的角度对因果关系进行概念性分析,但这不是本文采用的方法,因为有人认为,因果关系没有单一的概念。相反,按照奈德·霍尔的观点,各种各样的因果关系概念被分为两大阵营,作为生产的因果关系和作为依赖的因果关系。在这两个阵营中,可以看到,因果关系的特征可以由适当的权力和影响的存在产生,而关于因果关系是否发生的问题可以通过观察相关权力和影响的安排来部分回答。因此,有人认为因果关系是以因果影响的结构为基础的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causation
This chapter investigates the relation between an ontology of power and influence and the metaphysics of causation. A traditional approach to this task might involve an attempt to provide a conceptual analysis of causation in terms of power and influence, but that is not the approach taken here, for it is argued that there is no single concept of causation. Rather, following Ned Hall, the various concepts of causation are divided into two main camps, causation as production and causation as dependence. In both camps, it is shown, the characteristic features of causation can be generated by the existence of appropriate powers and influences, and questions about whether causation has occurred can be answered, in part, by looking at the arrangement of relevant powers and influences. Thus, it is argued that causation is grounded in structures of causal influence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信