{"title":"LPS和LRF:延迟和中断容忍网络的有效缓冲管理策略","authors":"J. Naves, I. Moraes, C. Albuquerque","doi":"10.1109/LCN.2012.6423649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs), the message delivery rate is impacted by the buffer management policy adopted by nodes once buffer overflows occur frequently. This paper proposes two new buffer management policies. The first one, called LPS (Less Probable Sprayed), uses the messages delivery probability and estimates the number of replicas already disseminated to decide which message to drop. The second one, named LRF (Least Recently Forwarded), drops the least recently forwarded message based on the assumption that messages not forwarded over a certain period of time have already reached several next hops. These two policies are implemented and compared with existing proposals found in the literature. The analysis considers traces of three real networks in which LPS and LRF policies provide higher delivery rates up to 75% and 37%, respectively, than the rate provided by the second best policy, with less overhead.","PeriodicalId":209071,"journal":{"name":"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LPS and LRF: Efficient buffer management policies for Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks\",\"authors\":\"J. Naves, I. Moraes, C. Albuquerque\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCN.2012.6423649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs), the message delivery rate is impacted by the buffer management policy adopted by nodes once buffer overflows occur frequently. This paper proposes two new buffer management policies. The first one, called LPS (Less Probable Sprayed), uses the messages delivery probability and estimates the number of replicas already disseminated to decide which message to drop. The second one, named LRF (Least Recently Forwarded), drops the least recently forwarded message based on the assumption that messages not forwarded over a certain period of time have already reached several next hops. These two policies are implemented and compared with existing proposals found in the literature. The analysis considers traces of three real networks in which LPS and LRF policies provide higher delivery rates up to 75% and 37%, respectively, than the rate provided by the second best policy, with less overhead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2012.6423649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2012.6423649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
摘要
在容忍延迟中断网络(Delay and Disruption Tolerant network, DTNs)中,当缓冲区频繁溢出时,节点所采用的缓冲区管理策略会影响消息的传递速率。本文提出了两种新的缓冲区管理策略。第一种方法称为LPS (Less Probable spray),它使用消息传递概率并估计已经传播的副本的数量来决定丢弃哪条消息。第二个是LRF(最近最少转发),它会丢弃最近最少转发的消息,因为它假定在一段时间内未转发的消息已经到达了几个下一跳。实施这两项政策,并与文献中发现的现有建议进行比较。该分析考虑了三个实际网络的轨迹,其中LPS和LRF策略提供的投递率分别高达75%和37%,比第二优策略提供的投递率更高,开销更少。
LPS and LRF: Efficient buffer management policies for Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks
In Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs), the message delivery rate is impacted by the buffer management policy adopted by nodes once buffer overflows occur frequently. This paper proposes two new buffer management policies. The first one, called LPS (Less Probable Sprayed), uses the messages delivery probability and estimates the number of replicas already disseminated to decide which message to drop. The second one, named LRF (Least Recently Forwarded), drops the least recently forwarded message based on the assumption that messages not forwarded over a certain period of time have already reached several next hops. These two policies are implemented and compared with existing proposals found in the literature. The analysis considers traces of three real networks in which LPS and LRF policies provide higher delivery rates up to 75% and 37%, respectively, than the rate provided by the second best policy, with less overhead.