LPS和LRF:延迟和中断容忍网络的有效缓冲管理策略

J. Naves, I. Moraes, C. Albuquerque
{"title":"LPS和LRF:延迟和中断容忍网络的有效缓冲管理策略","authors":"J. Naves, I. Moraes, C. Albuquerque","doi":"10.1109/LCN.2012.6423649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs), the message delivery rate is impacted by the buffer management policy adopted by nodes once buffer overflows occur frequently. This paper proposes two new buffer management policies. The first one, called LPS (Less Probable Sprayed), uses the messages delivery probability and estimates the number of replicas already disseminated to decide which message to drop. The second one, named LRF (Least Recently Forwarded), drops the least recently forwarded message based on the assumption that messages not forwarded over a certain period of time have already reached several next hops. These two policies are implemented and compared with existing proposals found in the literature. The analysis considers traces of three real networks in which LPS and LRF policies provide higher delivery rates up to 75% and 37%, respectively, than the rate provided by the second best policy, with less overhead.","PeriodicalId":209071,"journal":{"name":"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LPS and LRF: Efficient buffer management policies for Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks\",\"authors\":\"J. Naves, I. Moraes, C. Albuquerque\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCN.2012.6423649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs), the message delivery rate is impacted by the buffer management policy adopted by nodes once buffer overflows occur frequently. This paper proposes two new buffer management policies. The first one, called LPS (Less Probable Sprayed), uses the messages delivery probability and estimates the number of replicas already disseminated to decide which message to drop. The second one, named LRF (Least Recently Forwarded), drops the least recently forwarded message based on the assumption that messages not forwarded over a certain period of time have already reached several next hops. These two policies are implemented and compared with existing proposals found in the literature. The analysis considers traces of three real networks in which LPS and LRF policies provide higher delivery rates up to 75% and 37%, respectively, than the rate provided by the second best policy, with less overhead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2012.6423649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2012.6423649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

在容忍延迟中断网络(Delay and Disruption Tolerant network, DTNs)中,当缓冲区频繁溢出时,节点所采用的缓冲区管理策略会影响消息的传递速率。本文提出了两种新的缓冲区管理策略。第一种方法称为LPS (Less Probable spray),它使用消息传递概率并估计已经传播的副本的数量来决定丢弃哪条消息。第二个是LRF(最近最少转发),它会丢弃最近最少转发的消息,因为它假定在一段时间内未转发的消息已经到达了几个下一跳。实施这两项政策,并与文献中发现的现有建议进行比较。该分析考虑了三个实际网络的轨迹,其中LPS和LRF策略提供的投递率分别高达75%和37%,比第二优策略提供的投递率更高,开销更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LPS and LRF: Efficient buffer management policies for Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks
In Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs), the message delivery rate is impacted by the buffer management policy adopted by nodes once buffer overflows occur frequently. This paper proposes two new buffer management policies. The first one, called LPS (Less Probable Sprayed), uses the messages delivery probability and estimates the number of replicas already disseminated to decide which message to drop. The second one, named LRF (Least Recently Forwarded), drops the least recently forwarded message based on the assumption that messages not forwarded over a certain period of time have already reached several next hops. These two policies are implemented and compared with existing proposals found in the literature. The analysis considers traces of three real networks in which LPS and LRF policies provide higher delivery rates up to 75% and 37%, respectively, than the rate provided by the second best policy, with less overhead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信