{"title":"(几乎)沉默的信笺笔María de San jos<s:1>","authors":"Bárbara Mujica","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1985ws0.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teresa de Ávila had hoped that María de San José (1548–1603) would succeed\n her as foundress of convents and head of the Carmelite reform. However,\n María clashed with the Discalced hierarchy when the Provincial, Nicolás\n Doria, sought to modify the Constitutions of the order. She and Ana de Jesús\n appealed to the Pope in what came to be known as the “nuns’ revolt”, but,\n in the end, Doria won out. María was imprisoned and eventually exiled to\n a remote convent, where she soon died. María had received an excellent\n education as a child at the palace of Duchess Luisa de la Cerda, and she\n wrote many well-reasoned, legalistic letters defending her position.","PeriodicalId":158553,"journal":{"name":"Women Religious and Epistolary Exchange in the Carmelite Reform","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The (Almost) Silenced Epistolary Pen of María de San José\",\"authors\":\"Bárbara Mujica\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1985ws0.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teresa de Ávila had hoped that María de San José (1548–1603) would succeed\\n her as foundress of convents and head of the Carmelite reform. However,\\n María clashed with the Discalced hierarchy when the Provincial, Nicolás\\n Doria, sought to modify the Constitutions of the order. She and Ana de Jesús\\n appealed to the Pope in what came to be known as the “nuns’ revolt”, but,\\n in the end, Doria won out. María was imprisoned and eventually exiled to\\n a remote convent, where she soon died. María had received an excellent\\n education as a child at the palace of Duchess Luisa de la Cerda, and she\\n wrote many well-reasoned, legalistic letters defending her position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women Religious and Epistolary Exchange in the Carmelite Reform\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women Religious and Epistolary Exchange in the Carmelite Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1985ws0.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women Religious and Epistolary Exchange in the Carmelite Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1985ws0.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
特蕾莎·德Ávila曾希望María德圣何塞(1548-1603)将接替她成为修道院的创始人和加尔默罗会改革的负责人。然而,María与Discalced等级发生冲突,当省Nicolás Doria试图修改秩序的宪法。她和Ana de Jesús向教皇提出申诉,这后来被称为“修女起义”,但最终,Doria胜出。María被监禁,最终被流放到一个偏远的修道院,在那里她很快就死了。María小时候在路易莎·德拉·塞尔达公爵夫人的宫殿里接受了良好的教育,她写了许多理由充分的法律信函来捍卫自己的立场。
The (Almost) Silenced Epistolary Pen of María de San José
Teresa de Ávila had hoped that María de San José (1548–1603) would succeed
her as foundress of convents and head of the Carmelite reform. However,
María clashed with the Discalced hierarchy when the Provincial, Nicolás
Doria, sought to modify the Constitutions of the order. She and Ana de Jesús
appealed to the Pope in what came to be known as the “nuns’ revolt”, but,
in the end, Doria won out. María was imprisoned and eventually exiled to
a remote convent, where she soon died. María had received an excellent
education as a child at the palace of Duchess Luisa de la Cerda, and she
wrote many well-reasoned, legalistic letters defending her position.