一个集成可靠性、鲁棒性、弹性和脆弱性以评估系统适应性的框架

M. Rostami, S. Bucking
{"title":"一个集成可靠性、鲁棒性、弹性和脆弱性以评估系统适应性的框架","authors":"M. Rostami, S. Bucking","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-73021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The growing effort to improve a mechanical system’s performance with a sustainable perspective has created more complexity due to the need for additional technological subsystems. Increased complexity could result in new failure modes for systems making performance assessment more challenging. Therefore, it is essential to develop frameworks to assess performance based on a broader approach beyond single indicators. However, when considering reliability, resilience, robustness, and vulnerability (3RV) concepts as single mathematical-based models for assessing a system’s performance, designers are confronted by similarities between these concepts. In this regard, integrating these four concepts and developing a comprehensive variable (herein called system adaptivity) could better unify 3RV as a single objective function. Consequently, this study presents independent definitions for each concept and identifies common aspects and interrelationships between them. Finally, a system adaptivity objective function will be defined quantitatively by evaluating identified characteristics and internal and external relations for each concept in the previous step. This new prospect could represent a system’s adaptivity as an integrated framework towards different defined failure scenarios.","PeriodicalId":146533,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for Integrating Reliability, Robustness, Resilience, and Vulnerability to Assess System Adaptivity\",\"authors\":\"M. Rostami, S. Bucking\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2021-73021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The growing effort to improve a mechanical system’s performance with a sustainable perspective has created more complexity due to the need for additional technological subsystems. Increased complexity could result in new failure modes for systems making performance assessment more challenging. Therefore, it is essential to develop frameworks to assess performance based on a broader approach beyond single indicators. However, when considering reliability, resilience, robustness, and vulnerability (3RV) concepts as single mathematical-based models for assessing a system’s performance, designers are confronted by similarities between these concepts. In this regard, integrating these four concepts and developing a comprehensive variable (herein called system adaptivity) could better unify 3RV as a single objective function. Consequently, this study presents independent definitions for each concept and identifies common aspects and interrelationships between them. Finally, a system adaptivity objective function will be defined quantitatively by evaluating identified characteristics and internal and external relations for each concept in the previous step. This new prospect could represent a system’s adaptivity as an integrated framework towards different defined failure scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-73021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-73021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

由于需要额外的技术子系统,从可持续的角度提高机械系统性能的努力越来越多,这带来了更多的复杂性。增加的复杂性可能导致系统出现新的故障模式,从而使性能评估更具挑战性。因此,必须制定框架,以超越单一指标的更广泛方法来评估绩效。然而,当考虑可靠性、弹性、健壮性和脆弱性(3RV)概念作为评估系统性能的单一基于数学的模型时,设计人员面临着这些概念之间的相似性。因此,将这四个概念整合起来,形成一个综合变量(这里称为系统自适应),可以更好地将3RV统一为一个单一的目标函数。因此,本研究为每个概念提出了独立的定义,并确定了它们之间的共同方面和相互关系。最后,通过评估前一步中每个概念的识别特征和内部和外部关系,定量地定义系统自适应目标函数。这种新的前景可以表示系统作为一个集成框架对不同定义的故障场景的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Framework for Integrating Reliability, Robustness, Resilience, and Vulnerability to Assess System Adaptivity
The growing effort to improve a mechanical system’s performance with a sustainable perspective has created more complexity due to the need for additional technological subsystems. Increased complexity could result in new failure modes for systems making performance assessment more challenging. Therefore, it is essential to develop frameworks to assess performance based on a broader approach beyond single indicators. However, when considering reliability, resilience, robustness, and vulnerability (3RV) concepts as single mathematical-based models for assessing a system’s performance, designers are confronted by similarities between these concepts. In this regard, integrating these four concepts and developing a comprehensive variable (herein called system adaptivity) could better unify 3RV as a single objective function. Consequently, this study presents independent definitions for each concept and identifies common aspects and interrelationships between them. Finally, a system adaptivity objective function will be defined quantitatively by evaluating identified characteristics and internal and external relations for each concept in the previous step. This new prospect could represent a system’s adaptivity as an integrated framework towards different defined failure scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信