酒精定价和可得性政策对亚人群有不同的影响吗?一篇评论

N. Giesbrecht, A. Wettlaufer, Samantha Cukier, Gillian Geddie, André-Henrique Gonçalves, Emilene Reisdorfer
{"title":"酒精定价和可得性政策对亚人群有不同的影响吗?一篇评论","authors":"N. Giesbrecht, A. Wettlaufer, Samantha Cukier, Gillian Geddie, André-Henrique Gonçalves, Emilene Reisdorfer","doi":"10.7895/IJADR.V5I3.227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Giesbrecht, N., Wettlaufer, A., Cukier, S., Geddie, G., Goncalves, A., & Reisdorfer, E. (2016). Do alcohol pricing and availability policies have differential effects on sub-populations? A commentary.  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 5 (3), 89-99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v5i3.227 Aims: Numerous policies have been shown to reduce the harm from alcohol; however, not all sub-populations respond similarly to policy interventions. This paper explores the specific effects of alcohol pricing policies and controls regarding physical availability on different types of harms from alcohol as well as on different sectors of the population, including impacts by gender, age, and drinking patterns. Design, Setting, Participants, and Measures: We focus on two dimensions. The first is alcohol pricing and taxation; the second is alcohol availability, comprising type of alcohol control system, outlet density, and hours/days of sale. We focused on peer-reviewed research and reviews published from 2005–2015, using several databases: PsycINFO, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Cochrane. Findings: Precautionary alcohol prices have substantial harm reduction potential, particularly among youth and high-risk drinkers. Restrictions on outlet densities and hours/days of sale impact the drinking patterns of underage youth, reduce high-risk drinking, and reduce alcohol-related harm. A reduction in prices or an increase in alcohol availability are associated with increase in high-risk drinking or alcohol-related harm. Conclusions: Future work should examine these policy measures in light of socioeconomic status and cultural factors, as well as impacts of policy interventions on evidence of harm to others from alcohol.","PeriodicalId":162336,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do alcohol pricing and availability policies have differential effects on sub-populations? A commentary\",\"authors\":\"N. Giesbrecht, A. Wettlaufer, Samantha Cukier, Gillian Geddie, André-Henrique Gonçalves, Emilene Reisdorfer\",\"doi\":\"10.7895/IJADR.V5I3.227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Giesbrecht, N., Wettlaufer, A., Cukier, S., Geddie, G., Goncalves, A., & Reisdorfer, E. (2016). Do alcohol pricing and availability policies have differential effects on sub-populations? A commentary.  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 5 (3), 89-99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v5i3.227 Aims: Numerous policies have been shown to reduce the harm from alcohol; however, not all sub-populations respond similarly to policy interventions. This paper explores the specific effects of alcohol pricing policies and controls regarding physical availability on different types of harms from alcohol as well as on different sectors of the population, including impacts by gender, age, and drinking patterns. Design, Setting, Participants, and Measures: We focus on two dimensions. The first is alcohol pricing and taxation; the second is alcohol availability, comprising type of alcohol control system, outlet density, and hours/days of sale. We focused on peer-reviewed research and reviews published from 2005–2015, using several databases: PsycINFO, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Cochrane. Findings: Precautionary alcohol prices have substantial harm reduction potential, particularly among youth and high-risk drinkers. Restrictions on outlet densities and hours/days of sale impact the drinking patterns of underage youth, reduce high-risk drinking, and reduce alcohol-related harm. A reduction in prices or an increase in alcohol availability are associated with increase in high-risk drinking or alcohol-related harm. Conclusions: Future work should examine these policy measures in light of socioeconomic status and cultural factors, as well as impacts of policy interventions on evidence of harm to others from alcohol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7895/IJADR.V5I3.227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7895/IJADR.V5I3.227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

Giesbrecht, N., Wettlaufer, A., Cukier, S., Geddie, G., Goncalves, A., & Reisdorfer, E.(2016)。酒精定价和可得性政策对亚人群有不同的影响吗?一个评论。《国际酒精和药物研究杂志》,5(3),89-99。目的:许多政策已被证明可以减少酒精的危害;然而,并非所有亚群对政策干预的反应都相似。本文探讨了酒精定价政策和控制措施对不同类型酒精危害的具体影响,以及对不同人群的具体影响,包括性别、年龄和饮酒模式的影响。设计、设置、参与者和测量:我们关注两个维度。首先是酒类定价和税收;第二是酒精供应,包括酒精控制系统的类型、出口密度和销售时间/天数。我们使用了PsycINFO、MEDLINE/PubMed和Cochrane等数据库,重点关注2005-2015年发表的同行评议研究和评论。研究结果:预防性酒精价格具有巨大的减少危害的潜力,特别是在年轻人和高风险饮酒者中。对门店密度和销售时间/天数的限制影响了未成年青少年的饮酒模式,减少了高风险饮酒,减少了与酒精有关的危害。价格的降低或酒精供应的增加与高风险饮酒或酒精相关危害的增加有关。结论:未来的工作应该根据社会经济地位和文化因素,以及政策干预对酒精对他人伤害证据的影响来检查这些政策措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do alcohol pricing and availability policies have differential effects on sub-populations? A commentary
Giesbrecht, N., Wettlaufer, A., Cukier, S., Geddie, G., Goncalves, A., & Reisdorfer, E. (2016). Do alcohol pricing and availability policies have differential effects on sub-populations? A commentary.  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 5 (3), 89-99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v5i3.227 Aims: Numerous policies have been shown to reduce the harm from alcohol; however, not all sub-populations respond similarly to policy interventions. This paper explores the specific effects of alcohol pricing policies and controls regarding physical availability on different types of harms from alcohol as well as on different sectors of the population, including impacts by gender, age, and drinking patterns. Design, Setting, Participants, and Measures: We focus on two dimensions. The first is alcohol pricing and taxation; the second is alcohol availability, comprising type of alcohol control system, outlet density, and hours/days of sale. We focused on peer-reviewed research and reviews published from 2005–2015, using several databases: PsycINFO, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Cochrane. Findings: Precautionary alcohol prices have substantial harm reduction potential, particularly among youth and high-risk drinkers. Restrictions on outlet densities and hours/days of sale impact the drinking patterns of underage youth, reduce high-risk drinking, and reduce alcohol-related harm. A reduction in prices or an increase in alcohol availability are associated with increase in high-risk drinking or alcohol-related harm. Conclusions: Future work should examine these policy measures in light of socioeconomic status and cultural factors, as well as impacts of policy interventions on evidence of harm to others from alcohol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信