不同类型的投资者有不同的知情交易吗?

Hyejin Park, Kee H. Chung, I. Kim
{"title":"不同类型的投资者有不同的知情交易吗?","authors":"Hyejin Park, Kee H. Chung, I. Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2650101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we compare the extent of informed trading across investor types in the Korean stock market using intraday quote and trade data from January 2006 to September 2013. We estimate for each stock the probability of information-based trading (PIN) using trades that are initiated by foreign institutional investors, domestic institutional investors, and domestic individual investors separately. The results show that PIN values of foreign and domestic institutional investors are much higher than those of individual investors. Contrary to the belief of some market participants, however, we find that PIN values of foreign institutional investors are lower than those of domestic institutional investors, suggesting that domestic institutional investors engage in more informed trading than foreign institutional investors. We also find a strong cross-sectional relation between PIN and stock/firm attributes.","PeriodicalId":172652,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Informed Trading Different Across Investor Types?\",\"authors\":\"Hyejin Park, Kee H. Chung, I. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2650101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study we compare the extent of informed trading across investor types in the Korean stock market using intraday quote and trade data from January 2006 to September 2013. We estimate for each stock the probability of information-based trading (PIN) using trades that are initiated by foreign institutional investors, domestic institutional investors, and domestic individual investors separately. The results show that PIN values of foreign and domestic institutional investors are much higher than those of individual investors. Contrary to the belief of some market participants, however, we find that PIN values of foreign institutional investors are lower than those of domestic institutional investors, suggesting that domestic institutional investors engage in more informed trading than foreign institutional investors. We also find a strong cross-sectional relation between PIN and stock/firm attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2650101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2650101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本研究中,我们使用2006年1月至2013年9月的盘中报价和交易数据,比较了韩国股票市场中不同投资者类型的知情交易程度。我们分别使用由国外机构投资者、国内机构投资者和国内个人投资者发起的交易来估计每只股票的信息交易(PIN)的概率。结果表明,国内外机构投资者的PIN值远高于个人投资者。然而,与一些市场参与者的看法相反,我们发现境外机构投资者的PIN值低于境内机构投资者,这表明境内机构投资者比境外机构投资者更知情地进行交易。我们还发现PIN和股票/公司属性之间存在很强的横截面关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Informed Trading Different Across Investor Types?
In this study we compare the extent of informed trading across investor types in the Korean stock market using intraday quote and trade data from January 2006 to September 2013. We estimate for each stock the probability of information-based trading (PIN) using trades that are initiated by foreign institutional investors, domestic institutional investors, and domestic individual investors separately. The results show that PIN values of foreign and domestic institutional investors are much higher than those of individual investors. Contrary to the belief of some market participants, however, we find that PIN values of foreign institutional investors are lower than those of domestic institutional investors, suggesting that domestic institutional investors engage in more informed trading than foreign institutional investors. We also find a strong cross-sectional relation between PIN and stock/firm attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信