北美自由贸易协定第1105条下的司法拒绝:20年判例法回顾

P. Dumberry
{"title":"北美自由贸易协定第1105条下的司法拒绝:20年判例法回顾","authors":"P. Dumberry","doi":"10.54648/asab2014025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines one ground of complaint which has been consistently raised by investors in the context of their claims of breach of the fair and equitable treatment standard under NAFTA Article 1105: allegations of denial of justice by the host State and its failure to respect due process. The present article analyses the most salient features of NAFTA Chapter 11 case law regarding these two concepts. Specifically, this article analyses how NAFTA tribunals have interpreted and applied the exhaustion of local remedies rule. It also examines the different 'tests' that have been put forward by them to determine whether or not a denial of justice has been committed. Finally, this article addresses the actual scope and contours of the prohibition against denial of justice and the obligation of due process and the different circumstances under which tribunals have concluded that these standards have been breached.","PeriodicalId":329462,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Adjudication (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Denial of Justice Under NAFTA Article 1105: A Review of 20 Years of Case Law\",\"authors\":\"P. Dumberry\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/asab2014025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines one ground of complaint which has been consistently raised by investors in the context of their claims of breach of the fair and equitable treatment standard under NAFTA Article 1105: allegations of denial of justice by the host State and its failure to respect due process. The present article analyses the most salient features of NAFTA Chapter 11 case law regarding these two concepts. Specifically, this article analyses how NAFTA tribunals have interpreted and applied the exhaustion of local remedies rule. It also examines the different 'tests' that have been put forward by them to determine whether or not a denial of justice has been committed. Finally, this article addresses the actual scope and contours of the prohibition against denial of justice and the obligation of due process and the different circumstances under which tribunals have concluded that these standards have been breached.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: International Adjudication (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: International Adjudication (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/asab2014025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Adjudication (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/asab2014025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文审查了投资者在声称违反《北美自由贸易协定》第1105条规定的公平和公平待遇标准时一贯提出的一项申诉理由:指控东道国拒绝伸张正义,不尊重正当程序。本文分析了北美自由贸易协定第11章关于这两个概念的判例法的最显著特征。具体而言,本文分析了北美自由贸易协定法庭如何解释和适用用尽地方救济规则。它还审查了它们为确定是否存在剥夺司法公正行为而提出的不同"检验"。最后,本条论述了禁止拒绝司法公正和正当程序义务的实际范围和范围,以及法庭在何种不同情况下得出结论认为违反了这些标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Denial of Justice Under NAFTA Article 1105: A Review of 20 Years of Case Law
This article examines one ground of complaint which has been consistently raised by investors in the context of their claims of breach of the fair and equitable treatment standard under NAFTA Article 1105: allegations of denial of justice by the host State and its failure to respect due process. The present article analyses the most salient features of NAFTA Chapter 11 case law regarding these two concepts. Specifically, this article analyses how NAFTA tribunals have interpreted and applied the exhaustion of local remedies rule. It also examines the different 'tests' that have been put forward by them to determine whether or not a denial of justice has been committed. Finally, this article addresses the actual scope and contours of the prohibition against denial of justice and the obligation of due process and the different circumstances under which tribunals have concluded that these standards have been breached.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信