批判性思维能力及其对小学生的影响

S. Sarwanto, L. E. W. Fajari, Chumdari Chumdari
{"title":"批判性思维能力及其对小学生的影响","authors":"S. Sarwanto, L. E. W. Fajari, Chumdari Chumdari","doi":"10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This study aimed to examine elementary school students’ critical thinking skills and their impact.\n \nMethodology – This research was a qualitative case study. The subjects of this study were 29 fifth-grade students and three teachers at an elementary school, chosen by a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and critical thinking skills tests with open description types. The data validation technique used triangulation, applied to the study’s methods, sources, and theories. The data analytical framework of this research employed Milles and Hubberman's (1994) interactive analysis model with the following stages: data validity, data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions.\n \nFindings – Based on the research result analysis and discussion, only 10% of students whose scores were above the minimum completeness criteria from the school, and the class average only reached 50 out of 100. The scores on each indicator of critical thinking skills from the highest to the lowest, respectively, were inference with an average of 70, analysis with an average of 63, interpretation with an average of 56, and explanations with an average of 50. This low critical thinking skill was caused by students' mistakes in answering the test questions. This research concluded that elementary school students’ critical thinking skills were still very low and caused by student factors: (a) students’ answers were not systematic; (b) students identified questions incorrectly and simply summarized the questions, then using them as answers directly; (c) misconception; (d) students relied on memory, not understanding. Meanwhile, the teacher factors comprised: (a) the learning model used by the teachers was dominant in the direct learning model with the lecture method; (b) the problem description provided was not familiar for students; (c) the problem and its resolution strategy offered did not make the students understand; (d) the teachers did not understand the material, lacked expertise in delivering the material, and used the textbook as the only source of information and delivery content.\n \nSignificance – The study results indicated that the elementary school students’ critical thinking skills were still low due to several factors. These factors were originating mainly from the students and teachers themselves. The implication is that the school needs to pay more attention to strategies to improve and develop students' critical thinking skills in the future. The findings can be used as a reference point when considering the planning of effective strategies to improve the teaching and learning of critical thinking skills in elementary schools.","PeriodicalId":375345,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND THEIR IMPACTS ON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS\",\"authors\":\"S. Sarwanto, L. E. W. Fajari, Chumdari Chumdari\",\"doi\":\"10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This study aimed to examine elementary school students’ critical thinking skills and their impact.\\n \\nMethodology – This research was a qualitative case study. The subjects of this study were 29 fifth-grade students and three teachers at an elementary school, chosen by a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and critical thinking skills tests with open description types. The data validation technique used triangulation, applied to the study’s methods, sources, and theories. The data analytical framework of this research employed Milles and Hubberman's (1994) interactive analysis model with the following stages: data validity, data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions.\\n \\nFindings – Based on the research result analysis and discussion, only 10% of students whose scores were above the minimum completeness criteria from the school, and the class average only reached 50 out of 100. The scores on each indicator of critical thinking skills from the highest to the lowest, respectively, were inference with an average of 70, analysis with an average of 63, interpretation with an average of 56, and explanations with an average of 50. This low critical thinking skill was caused by students' mistakes in answering the test questions. This research concluded that elementary school students’ critical thinking skills were still very low and caused by student factors: (a) students’ answers were not systematic; (b) students identified questions incorrectly and simply summarized the questions, then using them as answers directly; (c) misconception; (d) students relied on memory, not understanding. Meanwhile, the teacher factors comprised: (a) the learning model used by the teachers was dominant in the direct learning model with the lecture method; (b) the problem description provided was not familiar for students; (c) the problem and its resolution strategy offered did not make the students understand; (d) the teachers did not understand the material, lacked expertise in delivering the material, and used the textbook as the only source of information and delivery content.\\n \\nSignificance – The study results indicated that the elementary school students’ critical thinking skills were still low due to several factors. These factors were originating mainly from the students and teachers themselves. The implication is that the school needs to pay more attention to strategies to improve and develop students' critical thinking skills in the future. The findings can be used as a reference point when considering the planning of effective strategies to improve the teaching and learning of critical thinking skills in elementary schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨小学生的批判性思维能力及其影响。方法论-本研究是一个定性的案例研究。本研究以某小学五年级学生29名、教师3名为研究对象,采用有目的抽样方法。数据收集通过观察,访谈和批判性思维技能测试与开放描述类型。数据验证技术使用三角测量,应用于研究的方法、来源和理论。本研究的数据分析框架采用Milles和Hubberman(1994)的交互分析模型,分为数据有效性、数据收集、数据简化、数据呈现和得出结论四个阶段。▽调查结果=通过对调查结果的分析和讨论,只有10%的学生达到了学校规定的最低完成标准,班级平均成绩也只有50分(满分100分)。批判性思维能力各指标的得分从高到低依次为推理(平均70分)、分析(平均63分)、解释(平均56分)、解释(平均50分)。这种低批判性思维能力是由学生在回答测试问题时的错误造成的。本研究认为,小学生的批判性思维能力仍然很低,这是由学生因素造成的:(a)学生的回答不系统;(b)学生不正确地识别问题并简单地总结问题,然后直接将其作为答案;(c)的误解;(d)学生依赖记忆,而不是理解。与此同时,教师因素包括:(a)教师使用的学习模式在授课式直接学习模式中占主导地位;(b)学生不熟悉所提供的问题描述;(c)问题及其解决策略不能让学生理解;(d)教师不理解教材内容,缺乏传授教材的专业知识,将教材作为唯一的信息来源和传授内容。意义-研究结果表明,由于几个因素,小学生的批判性思维能力仍然较低。这些因素主要来源于学生和教师自身。言下之意是,学校需要更多地关注未来提高和发展学生批判性思维技能的策略。研究结果可作为考虑制定有效策略以改善小学批判性思维技能教与学的参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND THEIR IMPACTS ON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
Purpose – This study aimed to examine elementary school students’ critical thinking skills and their impact. Methodology – This research was a qualitative case study. The subjects of this study were 29 fifth-grade students and three teachers at an elementary school, chosen by a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and critical thinking skills tests with open description types. The data validation technique used triangulation, applied to the study’s methods, sources, and theories. The data analytical framework of this research employed Milles and Hubberman's (1994) interactive analysis model with the following stages: data validity, data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. Findings – Based on the research result analysis and discussion, only 10% of students whose scores were above the minimum completeness criteria from the school, and the class average only reached 50 out of 100. The scores on each indicator of critical thinking skills from the highest to the lowest, respectively, were inference with an average of 70, analysis with an average of 63, interpretation with an average of 56, and explanations with an average of 50. This low critical thinking skill was caused by students' mistakes in answering the test questions. This research concluded that elementary school students’ critical thinking skills were still very low and caused by student factors: (a) students’ answers were not systematic; (b) students identified questions incorrectly and simply summarized the questions, then using them as answers directly; (c) misconception; (d) students relied on memory, not understanding. Meanwhile, the teacher factors comprised: (a) the learning model used by the teachers was dominant in the direct learning model with the lecture method; (b) the problem description provided was not familiar for students; (c) the problem and its resolution strategy offered did not make the students understand; (d) the teachers did not understand the material, lacked expertise in delivering the material, and used the textbook as the only source of information and delivery content. Significance – The study results indicated that the elementary school students’ critical thinking skills were still low due to several factors. These factors were originating mainly from the students and teachers themselves. The implication is that the school needs to pay more attention to strategies to improve and develop students' critical thinking skills in the future. The findings can be used as a reference point when considering the planning of effective strategies to improve the teaching and learning of critical thinking skills in elementary schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信