{"title":"基因树与物种树比较的方法有注释复制、树作图和复制","authors":"O. Eulenstein, B. Mirkin, M. Vingron","doi":"10.1090/dimacs/037/05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews the authors work on the idea of employing the mechanism of gene duplication in explaining the di erences between a gene and species trees Three existing approaches are presented as based on a tree mapping b annotating duplication and c copying duplication modeling Correspondences between a and b and b and c are mathematically explored It is proven in particular that approaches b and c lead to equivalent duplication histories Moreover all the three approaches equivalently count the numbers of duplications and losses needed to explain all the di erences between trees","PeriodicalId":336874,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of annotating duplication, tree mapping, and copying as methods to compare gene trees with species trees\",\"authors\":\"O. Eulenstein, B. Mirkin, M. Vingron\",\"doi\":\"10.1090/dimacs/037/05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reviews the authors work on the idea of employing the mechanism of gene duplication in explaining the di erences between a gene and species trees Three existing approaches are presented as based on a tree mapping b annotating duplication and c copying duplication modeling Correspondences between a and b and b and c are mathematically explored It is proven in particular that approaches b and c lead to equivalent duplication histories Moreover all the three approaches equivalently count the numbers of duplications and losses needed to explain all the di erences between trees\",\"PeriodicalId\":336874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1090/dimacs/037/05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1090/dimacs/037/05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of annotating duplication, tree mapping, and copying as methods to compare gene trees with species trees
This paper reviews the authors work on the idea of employing the mechanism of gene duplication in explaining the di erences between a gene and species trees Three existing approaches are presented as based on a tree mapping b annotating duplication and c copying duplication modeling Correspondences between a and b and b and c are mathematically explored It is proven in particular that approaches b and c lead to equivalent duplication histories Moreover all the three approaches equivalently count the numbers of duplications and losses needed to explain all the di erences between trees
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
