银行信贷协议中与消费者保护法相关的新条款

Komang Yustika Dewi Suryaningsih, A. T. R. Gorda
{"title":"银行信贷协议中与消费者保护法相关的新条款","authors":"Komang Yustika Dewi Suryaningsih, A. T. R. Gorda","doi":"10.22225/JHP.8.1.2021.30-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of banking institutions’ existence in one side provide very high risk for banks and in the other side provide profit for public as fund user’s clients.  Standard contract circulating in public seen from viewpoint of many parties is still detrimental with clauses presence in the contract. The content of standard contract in general is biased because it tends to benefit the contract maker. The standard contract if seen from the legal side is still being debated in terms of principles and validity requirement of an agreement. The inclusion of this clause shows the strength of creditor’s position which actually already strong despite without the inclusion of this clause. In banking practice, it is found in credit granting by bank the inclusion of unilateral terms which states that “the bank at any time is allowed to change the interest rate beforehand” in the contract that has been standardized previously by the bank. Credit agreement in standard form which is being made unilaterally by the bank until present is still becoming a special legal issue in agreement field of civil law. In addition, viewed from the side of the agreement it is also against consumer protection law as set in Consumer Protection Act. Problem formulation of this thesis is divided into namely regarding the existence of standard clause in bank agreement if associated with Article 18 of Consumer Protection Act and legal consequence of standard clause in credit agreement associated with consumer protection. The research in this thesis is Juridical empirical. The author is guided by laws and regulations related with public fact, that is first problem formulation is analyzed from balancing principle and next the second problem formulation is from consumer protection theory. \n ","PeriodicalId":251341,"journal":{"name":"Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Clause in Bank Credit Agreement in Relation to Consumer Protection Act\",\"authors\":\"Komang Yustika Dewi Suryaningsih, A. T. R. Gorda\",\"doi\":\"10.22225/JHP.8.1.2021.30-36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of banking institutions’ existence in one side provide very high risk for banks and in the other side provide profit for public as fund user’s clients.  Standard contract circulating in public seen from viewpoint of many parties is still detrimental with clauses presence in the contract. The content of standard contract in general is biased because it tends to benefit the contract maker. The standard contract if seen from the legal side is still being debated in terms of principles and validity requirement of an agreement. The inclusion of this clause shows the strength of creditor’s position which actually already strong despite without the inclusion of this clause. In banking practice, it is found in credit granting by bank the inclusion of unilateral terms which states that “the bank at any time is allowed to change the interest rate beforehand” in the contract that has been standardized previously by the bank. Credit agreement in standard form which is being made unilaterally by the bank until present is still becoming a special legal issue in agreement field of civil law. In addition, viewed from the side of the agreement it is also against consumer protection law as set in Consumer Protection Act. Problem formulation of this thesis is divided into namely regarding the existence of standard clause in bank agreement if associated with Article 18 of Consumer Protection Act and legal consequence of standard clause in credit agreement associated with consumer protection. The research in this thesis is Juridical empirical. The author is guided by laws and regulations related with public fact, that is first problem formulation is analyzed from balancing principle and next the second problem formulation is from consumer protection theory. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":251341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22225/JHP.8.1.2021.30-36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22225/JHP.8.1.2021.30-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

银行机构存在的重要性一方面为银行提供了极高的风险,另一方面为公众作为资金使用者的客户提供了利润。从多方当事人的角度来看,公开流通的标准合同在合同中存在条款的情况下仍然是有害的。一般来说,标准合同的内容是有偏见的,因为它往往有利于合同订立人。从法律角度看,标准合同在协议的原则和效力要求等方面仍存在争议。这一条款的加入表明,尽管没有加入这一条款,债权人的地位实际上已经很强了。在银行业实践中,我们发现在银行授信时,在银行事先规范的合同中加入了“允许银行随时事先调整利率”的单方条款。迄今为止,由银行单方面订立的标准形式的信用协议仍是民法协议领域的一个特殊法律问题。此外,从协议的角度来看,它也违反了《消费者保护法》中规定的消费者保护法。本文的问题提法分为银行协议中是否存在与《消费者保护法》第18条相关的标准条款,以及信用协议中是否存在与消费者保护相关的标准条款的法律后果。本文的研究是司法实证的。本文以与公共事实相关的法律法规为指导,从平衡原则出发分析第一问题的制定,从消费者保护理论出发分析第二问题的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Clause in Bank Credit Agreement in Relation to Consumer Protection Act
The importance of banking institutions’ existence in one side provide very high risk for banks and in the other side provide profit for public as fund user’s clients.  Standard contract circulating in public seen from viewpoint of many parties is still detrimental with clauses presence in the contract. The content of standard contract in general is biased because it tends to benefit the contract maker. The standard contract if seen from the legal side is still being debated in terms of principles and validity requirement of an agreement. The inclusion of this clause shows the strength of creditor’s position which actually already strong despite without the inclusion of this clause. In banking practice, it is found in credit granting by bank the inclusion of unilateral terms which states that “the bank at any time is allowed to change the interest rate beforehand” in the contract that has been standardized previously by the bank. Credit agreement in standard form which is being made unilaterally by the bank until present is still becoming a special legal issue in agreement field of civil law. In addition, viewed from the side of the agreement it is also against consumer protection law as set in Consumer Protection Act. Problem formulation of this thesis is divided into namely regarding the existence of standard clause in bank agreement if associated with Article 18 of Consumer Protection Act and legal consequence of standard clause in credit agreement associated with consumer protection. The research in this thesis is Juridical empirical. The author is guided by laws and regulations related with public fact, that is first problem formulation is analyzed from balancing principle and next the second problem formulation is from consumer protection theory.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信