波斯纳法官在基卡罗斯的意见

John A. Townsend
{"title":"波斯纳法官在基卡罗斯的意见","authors":"John A. Townsend","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2109619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I discuss in this article Judge Posner's decision in Kikalos v. United States, 400 F.3d 908 (7th Cir. 2005). I open with the following:I am a Judge Posner fan. My vantage point is tax procedure and tax crimes, areas in which I practice and teach as an adjunct at the University of Houston Law School. I require my students to read more Posner opinions than any other judge's opinions. Judge Posner is concise, erudite, pungent, and rigorously logical; and he avoids footnotes. His opinions are good for teaching and learning.In the article, I quibble, perhaps, on points of tax procedure, use of estimation methodologies by the taxpayer that are normally used by the Government, the presumption of correctness, and burdens of production and persuasion.","PeriodicalId":150734,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Courts (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judge Posner's Opinion in Kikalos\",\"authors\":\"John A. Townsend\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2109619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I discuss in this article Judge Posner's decision in Kikalos v. United States, 400 F.3d 908 (7th Cir. 2005). I open with the following:I am a Judge Posner fan. My vantage point is tax procedure and tax crimes, areas in which I practice and teach as an adjunct at the University of Houston Law School. I require my students to read more Posner opinions than any other judge's opinions. Judge Posner is concise, erudite, pungent, and rigorously logical; and he avoids footnotes. His opinions are good for teaching and learning.In the article, I quibble, perhaps, on points of tax procedure, use of estimation methodologies by the taxpayer that are normally used by the Government, the presumption of correctness, and burdens of production and persuasion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Courts (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Courts (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2109619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Courts (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2109619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我在本文中讨论波斯纳法官在Kikalos诉美国案中的判决,400 F.3d 908(2005年第7卷)。首先我要说:我是波斯纳法官的粉丝。我的优势是税务程序和税务犯罪,这是我在休斯敦大学法学院兼职的实践和教学领域。我要求我的学生多读波斯纳的意见,而不是其他法官的意见。波斯纳法官简洁、博学、辛辣、逻辑严谨;他避免了脚注。他的意见对教与学都有好处。在这篇文章中,我可能会对税收程序、纳税人使用的通常由政府使用的估算方法、对正确性的假设以及生产和说服的负担等问题进行吹毛求疵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judge Posner's Opinion in Kikalos
I discuss in this article Judge Posner's decision in Kikalos v. United States, 400 F.3d 908 (7th Cir. 2005). I open with the following:I am a Judge Posner fan. My vantage point is tax procedure and tax crimes, areas in which I practice and teach as an adjunct at the University of Houston Law School. I require my students to read more Posner opinions than any other judge's opinions. Judge Posner is concise, erudite, pungent, and rigorously logical; and he avoids footnotes. His opinions are good for teaching and learning.In the article, I quibble, perhaps, on points of tax procedure, use of estimation methodologies by the taxpayer that are normally used by the Government, the presumption of correctness, and burdens of production and persuasion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信