是罗马独特经济的基础

M. Silver
{"title":"是罗马独特经济的基础","authors":"M. Silver","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why did Roman slaves have a peculium or purse? It has been suggested that the grant of a peculium was a clever arrangement, a trick actually, by means of which owners incentivised slaves to perform unsupervised labour. Upon this incentive base stands Rome's \"peculium economy\" in which diverse and far-flung business and other activities are performed by minimally supervised slaves. However, forcibly taken slaves (including born-slaves), the kind still taken for granted in the scholarly literature, would not be sufficiently incentivised by peculia. The \"peculium economy\" stands, however, because the slaves forming its base are slaves by contract/self-sellers. The peculium, the legal and other evidence suggests, is a contractual benefit desired by and typically made available to free individuals who volunteered for slavery. This is precisely how, for example, the \"peculium\" arose in the eighteenth century trade in \"indentured servants\" between England and North America. The paper explores this finding and develops its implications for Roman economic growth.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"At the base of Rome's peculium economy\",\"authors\":\"M. Silver\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why did Roman slaves have a peculium or purse? It has been suggested that the grant of a peculium was a clever arrangement, a trick actually, by means of which owners incentivised slaves to perform unsupervised labour. Upon this incentive base stands Rome's \\\"peculium economy\\\" in which diverse and far-flung business and other activities are performed by minimally supervised slaves. However, forcibly taken slaves (including born-slaves), the kind still taken for granted in the scholarly literature, would not be sufficiently incentivised by peculia. The \\\"peculium economy\\\" stands, however, because the slaves forming its base are slaves by contract/self-sellers. The peculium, the legal and other evidence suggests, is a contractual benefit desired by and typically made available to free individuals who volunteered for slavery. This is precisely how, for example, the \\\"peculium\\\" arose in the eighteenth century trade in \\\"indentured servants\\\" between England and North America. The paper explores this finding and develops its implications for Roman economic growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为什么罗马奴隶有一个特殊的钱包?有人认为,给予奴隶特殊待遇是一种巧妙的安排,实际上是一种诡计,奴隶主通过这种方式激励奴隶从事无人监督的劳动。在这种激励基础上,罗马的“特殊经济”得以形成,在这种经济中,各种各样的商业活动和其他活动都是由监管最少的奴隶进行的。然而,强行带走的奴隶(包括天生的奴隶),在学术文献中仍然被认为是理所当然的,不会受到特殊的充分激励。然而,“特殊经济”仍然存在,因为构成其基础的奴隶是契约/自卖者的奴隶。法律和其他证据表明,这种特殊性是自愿成为奴隶的自由人所期望的一种合同利益,而且通常是提供给他们的。例如,这正是18世纪英国和北美之间的“契约仆人”贸易中“特殊性”产生的原因。本文探讨了这一发现,并发展了其对罗马经济增长的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
At the base of Rome's peculium economy
Why did Roman slaves have a peculium or purse? It has been suggested that the grant of a peculium was a clever arrangement, a trick actually, by means of which owners incentivised slaves to perform unsupervised labour. Upon this incentive base stands Rome's "peculium economy" in which diverse and far-flung business and other activities are performed by minimally supervised slaves. However, forcibly taken slaves (including born-slaves), the kind still taken for granted in the scholarly literature, would not be sufficiently incentivised by peculia. The "peculium economy" stands, however, because the slaves forming its base are slaves by contract/self-sellers. The peculium, the legal and other evidence suggests, is a contractual benefit desired by and typically made available to free individuals who volunteered for slavery. This is precisely how, for example, the "peculium" arose in the eighteenth century trade in "indentured servants" between England and North America. The paper explores this finding and develops its implications for Roman economic growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信