无线通信中对数正态变量和的统计

Paulo Cardieri, Theodore S. Rappaport
{"title":"无线通信中对数正态变量和的统计","authors":"Paulo Cardieri, Theodore S. Rappaport","doi":"10.1109/VETECS.2000.851587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schwartz and Yeh's method (1982) and Wilkinson's method are widely used to compute the moments of the total co-channel interference in wireless communication, usually modeled as the sum of lognormal random variables. The accuracy of these methods has been studied in previous works, under the assumption of having all summands signals (individual interference signals) identically distributed. Such assumption rarely holds in practical cases of emerging wireless systems, where interference may stem from far-away macrocells and nearby transmitters, causing the interference signals to have different moments. In this paper we present an analysis of Wilkinson's method and Schwartz and Yeh's method, for the general case when the summands have different mean values and standard deviations in decibel units. We show that Schwartz and Yeh's method provides better accuracy than Wilkinson's method and is virtually invariant with the difference of the mean values and standard deviations of the summands, and the number of summands.","PeriodicalId":318880,"journal":{"name":"VTC2000-Spring. 2000 IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37026)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistics of the sum of lognormal variables in wireless communications\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Cardieri, Theodore S. Rappaport\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VETECS.2000.851587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Schwartz and Yeh's method (1982) and Wilkinson's method are widely used to compute the moments of the total co-channel interference in wireless communication, usually modeled as the sum of lognormal random variables. The accuracy of these methods has been studied in previous works, under the assumption of having all summands signals (individual interference signals) identically distributed. Such assumption rarely holds in practical cases of emerging wireless systems, where interference may stem from far-away macrocells and nearby transmitters, causing the interference signals to have different moments. In this paper we present an analysis of Wilkinson's method and Schwartz and Yeh's method, for the general case when the summands have different mean values and standard deviations in decibel units. We show that Schwartz and Yeh's method provides better accuracy than Wilkinson's method and is virtually invariant with the difference of the mean values and standard deviations of the summands, and the number of summands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VTC2000-Spring. 2000 IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37026)\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"85\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VTC2000-Spring. 2000 IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37026)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECS.2000.851587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VTC2000-Spring. 2000 IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37026)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECS.2000.851587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

摘要

Schwartz和Yeh的方法(1982)和Wilkinson的方法被广泛用于计算无线通信中总同信道干扰的矩,通常建模为对数正态随机变量的和。在所有求和信号(单个干扰信号)均匀分布的假设下,这些方法的准确性已经在以前的工作中进行了研究。这种假设在新兴无线系统的实际情况中很少成立,因为干扰可能来自遥远的宏蜂窝和附近的发射器,导致干扰信号具有不同的时刻。在本文中,我们对Wilkinson的方法和Schwartz和Yeh的方法进行了分析,分析了以分贝为单位的和具有不同的平均值和标准差的一般情况。我们证明Schwartz和Yeh的方法比Wilkinson的方法提供了更好的准确性,并且对于和的平均值和标准差以及和的数量的差异几乎是不变的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistics of the sum of lognormal variables in wireless communications
Schwartz and Yeh's method (1982) and Wilkinson's method are widely used to compute the moments of the total co-channel interference in wireless communication, usually modeled as the sum of lognormal random variables. The accuracy of these methods has been studied in previous works, under the assumption of having all summands signals (individual interference signals) identically distributed. Such assumption rarely holds in practical cases of emerging wireless systems, where interference may stem from far-away macrocells and nearby transmitters, causing the interference signals to have different moments. In this paper we present an analysis of Wilkinson's method and Schwartz and Yeh's method, for the general case when the summands have different mean values and standard deviations in decibel units. We show that Schwartz and Yeh's method provides better accuracy than Wilkinson's method and is virtually invariant with the difference of the mean values and standard deviations of the summands, and the number of summands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信