金博尔的谨慎性和双基金分离:共同基金绩效评价的决定因素

Wolfgang Breuer, Marc Gürtler
{"title":"金博尔的谨慎性和双基金分离:共同基金绩效评价的决定因素","authors":"Wolfgang Breuer, Marc Gürtler","doi":"10.3790/KUK.41.4.501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider investors with mean-variance-skewness preferences who aim at selecting one out of F different funds and combining it optimally with the riskless asset and direct stock holdings. Direct stock holdings are either exogenously or endogenously determined. In our theoretical section, we derive and discuss several performance measures for the investor’s decision problems with a central role of Kimball’s (1990) prudence and of several variants of Sharpe and Treynor measures. In our empirical section, we show that the distinction between exogenous and endogenous stock holding is less important than the issue of skewness preferences. The latter are most relevant for fund rankings, when an investor’s skewness preferences are not derived from cubic HARA utility so that the two-fund separation theorem is not valid.","PeriodicalId":280048,"journal":{"name":"Kredit Und Kapital","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kimball's Prudence and Two-Fund Separation as Determinants of Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Breuer, Marc Gürtler\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/KUK.41.4.501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider investors with mean-variance-skewness preferences who aim at selecting one out of F different funds and combining it optimally with the riskless asset and direct stock holdings. Direct stock holdings are either exogenously or endogenously determined. In our theoretical section, we derive and discuss several performance measures for the investor’s decision problems with a central role of Kimball’s (1990) prudence and of several variants of Sharpe and Treynor measures. In our empirical section, we show that the distinction between exogenous and endogenous stock holding is less important than the issue of skewness preferences. The latter are most relevant for fund rankings, when an investor’s skewness preferences are not derived from cubic HARA utility so that the two-fund separation theorem is not valid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kredit Und Kapital\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kredit Und Kapital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/KUK.41.4.501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kredit Und Kapital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/KUK.41.4.501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考虑具有均值方差偏度偏好的投资者,他们的目标是从F种不同的基金中选择一种,并将其与无风险资产和直接股票持有最优组合。直接股票持有量是由外因或内因决定的。在我们的理论部分,我们推导并讨论了几个投资者决策问题的绩效指标,这些指标的核心作用是Kimball(1990)的谨慎性以及Sharpe和Treynor指标的几个变体。在我们的实证部分,我们表明外生和内生股票持有之间的区别不如偏度偏好问题重要。当投资者的偏度偏好不是由三次HARA效用得出时,后者与基金排名最相关,因此两基金分离定理不成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kimball's Prudence and Two-Fund Separation as Determinants of Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation
We consider investors with mean-variance-skewness preferences who aim at selecting one out of F different funds and combining it optimally with the riskless asset and direct stock holdings. Direct stock holdings are either exogenously or endogenously determined. In our theoretical section, we derive and discuss several performance measures for the investor’s decision problems with a central role of Kimball’s (1990) prudence and of several variants of Sharpe and Treynor measures. In our empirical section, we show that the distinction between exogenous and endogenous stock holding is less important than the issue of skewness preferences. The latter are most relevant for fund rankings, when an investor’s skewness preferences are not derived from cubic HARA utility so that the two-fund separation theorem is not valid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信