挑战ted演讲中关于性别角色的刻板印象

M. Azher, Attiqa Riaz, Abdul Ghaffar Ikram
{"title":"挑战ted演讲中关于性别角色的刻板印象","authors":"M. Azher, Attiqa Riaz, Abdul Ghaffar Ikram","doi":"10.46521/pjws.029.01.0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is designed to explicate how the paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationship of language is the embodiment of gender differences. The present research deals with data taken from TEDx videos of both male and female speakers to find out how the speech varies between both sexes; what lexical choices and grammatical patterns are used by the speakers to make their speech stand out. The data, after being transcribed according to the Jeffersonian system of transcription, are analysed in the light of multiple parameters of Lakoff’s Deficit Model (1975). The paper mainly focuses on how men and women exploit various linguistic choices in terms of topics, empty adjectives, hedges, intensives, super-polite adjectives, telling jokes and intonation in their talks. The results implicate that both men and women have reshaped their linguistic choices over time and, as opposed to Lakoff’s findings, women’s talk is getting subject-oriented, shaded with lesser use of intensifiers, empty adjectives and intonations; whereas men are using these parameters with conviction. This represents a negation of internalised stereotypes by both sexes.","PeriodicalId":233891,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Women's Studies: Alam-e-Niswan","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHALLENGING STEREOTYPES ABOUT GENDERED ROLES IN TED TALKS\",\"authors\":\"M. Azher, Attiqa Riaz, Abdul Ghaffar Ikram\",\"doi\":\"10.46521/pjws.029.01.0110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is designed to explicate how the paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationship of language is the embodiment of gender differences. The present research deals with data taken from TEDx videos of both male and female speakers to find out how the speech varies between both sexes; what lexical choices and grammatical patterns are used by the speakers to make their speech stand out. The data, after being transcribed according to the Jeffersonian system of transcription, are analysed in the light of multiple parameters of Lakoff’s Deficit Model (1975). The paper mainly focuses on how men and women exploit various linguistic choices in terms of topics, empty adjectives, hedges, intensives, super-polite adjectives, telling jokes and intonation in their talks. The results implicate that both men and women have reshaped their linguistic choices over time and, as opposed to Lakoff’s findings, women’s talk is getting subject-oriented, shaded with lesser use of intensifiers, empty adjectives and intonations; whereas men are using these parameters with conviction. This represents a negation of internalised stereotypes by both sexes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Women's Studies: Alam-e-Niswan\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Women's Studies: Alam-e-Niswan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46521/pjws.029.01.0110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Women's Studies: Alam-e-Niswan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46521/pjws.029.01.0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在说明语言的聚合和组合关系是性别差异的体现。目前的研究从TEDx视频中提取了男性和女性演讲者的数据,以找出两性之间的语言差异;说话者使用了哪些词汇选择和语法模式来使他们的演讲脱颖而出。根据杰斐逊转录系统转录后的数据,根据Lakoff的赤字模型(1975)的多个参数进行分析。本文主要研究男女在谈话中如何在话题、空形容词、模糊限制语、强调语气、超礼貌形容词、讲笑话和语调等方面运用各种语言选择。研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,男性和女性都在重塑他们的语言选择,与Lakoff的发现相反,女性的谈话越来越以主题为导向,越来越少地使用加强语气、空形容词和语调;而男性则坚定地使用这些参数。这代表了两性对内在刻板印象的否定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHALLENGING STEREOTYPES ABOUT GENDERED ROLES IN TED TALKS
This study is designed to explicate how the paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationship of language is the embodiment of gender differences. The present research deals with data taken from TEDx videos of both male and female speakers to find out how the speech varies between both sexes; what lexical choices and grammatical patterns are used by the speakers to make their speech stand out. The data, after being transcribed according to the Jeffersonian system of transcription, are analysed in the light of multiple parameters of Lakoff’s Deficit Model (1975). The paper mainly focuses on how men and women exploit various linguistic choices in terms of topics, empty adjectives, hedges, intensives, super-polite adjectives, telling jokes and intonation in their talks. The results implicate that both men and women have reshaped their linguistic choices over time and, as opposed to Lakoff’s findings, women’s talk is getting subject-oriented, shaded with lesser use of intensifiers, empty adjectives and intonations; whereas men are using these parameters with conviction. This represents a negation of internalised stereotypes by both sexes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信