热疗与手术刀皮肤切开手术效果比较

N. Khan, Shalabh Gupta, Tripta Bhagat
{"title":"热疗与手术刀皮肤切开手术效果比较","authors":"N. Khan, Shalabh Gupta, Tripta Bhagat","doi":"10.4103/sujhs.sujhs_12_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and Objectives: The present study compared the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases. Materials and Method: The present Prospective interventional study was done at Santosh Medical College & Hospital for a period of 1.5 years. Group A included 100 patients treated with Scalpel and Group B included 100 patients treated with Diathermy. Results: The mean Incision time (s), Incision time (s/cm2) and Pain VRS score at day 1 and 2 was significantly more among Scalpel group compared to Diathermy group. The mean Blood loss in incision (ml) was significantly more among Diathermy group compared to Scalpel group. Conclusion: Due to shorter incision times, less blood loss, and less early postoperative discomfort, diathermy incisions have substantial benefits over scalpels in both elective and emergency general surgery.","PeriodicalId":326476,"journal":{"name":"Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases\",\"authors\":\"N. Khan, Shalabh Gupta, Tripta Bhagat\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sujhs.sujhs_12_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim and Objectives: The present study compared the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases. Materials and Method: The present Prospective interventional study was done at Santosh Medical College & Hospital for a period of 1.5 years. Group A included 100 patients treated with Scalpel and Group B included 100 patients treated with Diathermy. Results: The mean Incision time (s), Incision time (s/cm2) and Pain VRS score at day 1 and 2 was significantly more among Scalpel group compared to Diathermy group. The mean Blood loss in incision (ml) was significantly more among Diathermy group compared to Scalpel group. Conclusion: Due to shorter incision times, less blood loss, and less early postoperative discomfort, diathermy incisions have substantial benefits over scalpels in both elective and emergency general surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sujhs.sujhs_12_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sujhs.sujhs_12_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目的:本研究比较了外科病例中透热与手术刀皮肤切开的结果。材料和方法:本前瞻性介入研究在Santosh医学院和医院进行,为期1.5年。A组采用手术刀治疗100例,B组采用透热治疗100例。结果:手术刀组平均切口时间(s)、切口时间(s/cm2)及第1、2天疼痛VRS评分均显著高于透热组。平均切口出血量(ml)明显高于手术刀组。结论:由于切口时间短,出血量少,术后早期不适少,在择期和急诊普外科中,透热切口都比手术刀有明显的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases
Aim and Objectives: The present study compared the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases. Materials and Method: The present Prospective interventional study was done at Santosh Medical College & Hospital for a period of 1.5 years. Group A included 100 patients treated with Scalpel and Group B included 100 patients treated with Diathermy. Results: The mean Incision time (s), Incision time (s/cm2) and Pain VRS score at day 1 and 2 was significantly more among Scalpel group compared to Diathermy group. The mean Blood loss in incision (ml) was significantly more among Diathermy group compared to Scalpel group. Conclusion: Due to shorter incision times, less blood loss, and less early postoperative discomfort, diathermy incisions have substantial benefits over scalpels in both elective and emergency general surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信