《世界模式之争:人类能否生存?》, Richard M. Laska著,《计算机决策》,1972年

W. Burkhardt
{"title":"《世界模式之争:人类能否生存?》, Richard M. Laska著,《计算机决策》,1972年","authors":"W. Burkhardt","doi":"10.1145/1103267.1103269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This well-written paper expounds in some detail on the well-publicized results of computer simulations of the behavior of dynamic world systems. These systems try to predict future trends of \"comfortability\" variables, like natural resources and food available, industrial output, population and pollution levels, etc. The models are based on equations, often overly simplistic or estimated, for the interaction of these variables. There seem to be no provisions for sideway modification of the variables: people moving to rural areas because of pollution, or to the suburbs because of crime; or substitution of natural resources by artificial ones. In addition, most of the parameters, like birth rates, appear to be static. Results under the chosen assumptions paint a \"worldwide breakdown\" (of industrial society) \"unless all growth in the variables can be stopped.\" To the reviewer, in a formerly pollution-ridden city, these worthwhile investigations appear not much more than the simple calculations of \"standing room only\" type, even if he does not agree with the strongest critics (\"a bunch of schoolkids with a computer predicting the world\"). The paper succeeds well in delineating the current controversy, even if in places it has a sensationalistic appearance. Also, more detailed technical material may have been of benefit.","PeriodicalId":129356,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigsoc Bulletin","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of \\\"The World Model Controversy: Will Mankind Survive?, by Richard M. Laska\\\", Computer Decisions, 1972\",\"authors\":\"W. Burkhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1103267.1103269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This well-written paper expounds in some detail on the well-publicized results of computer simulations of the behavior of dynamic world systems. These systems try to predict future trends of \\\"comfortability\\\" variables, like natural resources and food available, industrial output, population and pollution levels, etc. The models are based on equations, often overly simplistic or estimated, for the interaction of these variables. There seem to be no provisions for sideway modification of the variables: people moving to rural areas because of pollution, or to the suburbs because of crime; or substitution of natural resources by artificial ones. In addition, most of the parameters, like birth rates, appear to be static. Results under the chosen assumptions paint a \\\"worldwide breakdown\\\" (of industrial society) \\\"unless all growth in the variables can be stopped.\\\" To the reviewer, in a formerly pollution-ridden city, these worthwhile investigations appear not much more than the simple calculations of \\\"standing room only\\\" type, even if he does not agree with the strongest critics (\\\"a bunch of schoolkids with a computer predicting the world\\\"). The paper succeeds well in delineating the current controversy, even if in places it has a sensationalistic appearance. Also, more detailed technical material may have been of benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigsoc Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1972-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigsoc Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1103267.1103269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigsoc Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1103267.1103269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇写得很好的论文详细阐述了广为人知的计算机模拟动态世界系统行为的结果。这些系统试图预测“舒适”变量的未来趋势,如自然资源和可用食物、工业产出、人口和污染水平等。这些模型是基于这些变量相互作用的方程,通常过于简单或估计。似乎没有对这些变量进行横向修改的规定:人们因为污染而搬到农村地区,或者因为犯罪而搬到郊区;或者用人工资源代替自然资源。此外,大多数参数,如出生率,似乎是静态的。所选假设下的结果描绘了(工业社会的)“世界性崩溃”。“除非所有变量的增长都能被阻止。”对于评论者来说,在一个以前污染严重的城市,这些有价值的调查看起来只不过是“只有站着的地方”的简单计算,即使他不同意最强烈的批评(“一群小学生用电脑预测世界”)。这篇文章很好地描述了当前的争议,尽管有些地方看起来有些耸人听闻。此外,更详细的技术材料可能会有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of "The World Model Controversy: Will Mankind Survive?, by Richard M. Laska", Computer Decisions, 1972
This well-written paper expounds in some detail on the well-publicized results of computer simulations of the behavior of dynamic world systems. These systems try to predict future trends of "comfortability" variables, like natural resources and food available, industrial output, population and pollution levels, etc. The models are based on equations, often overly simplistic or estimated, for the interaction of these variables. There seem to be no provisions for sideway modification of the variables: people moving to rural areas because of pollution, or to the suburbs because of crime; or substitution of natural resources by artificial ones. In addition, most of the parameters, like birth rates, appear to be static. Results under the chosen assumptions paint a "worldwide breakdown" (of industrial society) "unless all growth in the variables can be stopped." To the reviewer, in a formerly pollution-ridden city, these worthwhile investigations appear not much more than the simple calculations of "standing room only" type, even if he does not agree with the strongest critics ("a bunch of schoolkids with a computer predicting the world"). The paper succeeds well in delineating the current controversy, even if in places it has a sensationalistic appearance. Also, more detailed technical material may have been of benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信