测试空气和蒸汽屏障接头,我们是否使用相关的测试方法?

E. Møller, T. V. Rasmussen
{"title":"测试空气和蒸汽屏障接头,我们是否使用相关的测试方法?","authors":"E. Møller, T. V. Rasmussen","doi":"10.23967/DBMC.2020.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes testing of peel and shear resistance and airtightness of joints of air and vapour barrier systems before and after artificial aging. The testing of peel and shear resistance was based on standardised methods while the test of airtightness was a method invented for this project. The results show that while peel and shear strength increased with aging, the airtightness was significantly reduced. As these two results seem to contradict each other, the methods are discussed, especially whether the standardised tests are too far from the conditions on site or joints should be tested on other materials as well. Furthermore, weaknesses in the airtightness method is also pointed out.","PeriodicalId":409611,"journal":{"name":"XV International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. eBook of Proceedings","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Joints of Air and Vapour Barriers, Do We Use Relevant Testing Methods?\",\"authors\":\"E. Møller, T. V. Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.23967/DBMC.2020.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes testing of peel and shear resistance and airtightness of joints of air and vapour barrier systems before and after artificial aging. The testing of peel and shear resistance was based on standardised methods while the test of airtightness was a method invented for this project. The results show that while peel and shear strength increased with aging, the airtightness was significantly reduced. As these two results seem to contradict each other, the methods are discussed, especially whether the standardised tests are too far from the conditions on site or joints should be tested on other materials as well. Furthermore, weaknesses in the airtightness method is also pointed out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"XV International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. eBook of Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"XV International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. eBook of Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23967/DBMC.2020.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"XV International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. eBook of Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23967/DBMC.2020.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文介绍了人工老化前后空气和蒸汽屏障系统接缝的抗剥离性、抗剪切性和气密性试验。剥离性和抗剪性测试采用标准化方法,气密性测试是为本项目发明的一种方法。结果表明:随着时效的增加,剥离强度和抗剪强度增大,但气密性明显降低;由于这两种结果似乎相互矛盾,因此对方法进行了讨论,特别是标准化测试是否与现场情况相差太远,或者是否需要在其他材料上进行接缝测试。此外,还指出了气密方法的不足之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing Joints of Air and Vapour Barriers, Do We Use Relevant Testing Methods?
This article describes testing of peel and shear resistance and airtightness of joints of air and vapour barrier systems before and after artificial aging. The testing of peel and shear resistance was based on standardised methods while the test of airtightness was a method invented for this project. The results show that while peel and shear strength increased with aging, the airtightness was significantly reduced. As these two results seem to contradict each other, the methods are discussed, especially whether the standardised tests are too far from the conditions on site or joints should be tested on other materials as well. Furthermore, weaknesses in the airtightness method is also pointed out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信