注意、对等和存在领域

Russell J. Duvernoy
{"title":"注意、对等和存在领域","authors":"Russell J. Duvernoy","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474466912.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter draws on Deleuze’s distinction between practices of philosophy and science to articulate a philosophical concept of ecology. Because ecology is constitutively concerned with relations between unity and diversity, it is necessarily entangled with metaphysical questions. The chapter uses Félix Guattari’s framework of the three ecologies (psychic, social, and material) and Deleuze and Guattari’s “existential territories” to connect the metaphysical conception of subjectivity from the book’s first half to the idea of psychic ecology. Drawing on Guattari and Jean-Luc Nancy, the chapter explores how what Marx calls “equivalence” exceeds its initial operation as metric of exchange to also function in the production of predictable patterns of subjectivity. Equivalence as a value tacitly orders and constrains attention in manners that make behaviour predictable, making equivalence-prediction two modes of the same logic perpetuating capitalist subjectivity. This diagnosis opens the possibility of counter habits of attention in the service of contributing to the active creation of different futures.","PeriodicalId":137199,"journal":{"name":"Affect and Attention After Deleuze and Whitehead","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attention, Equivalence and Existential Territories\",\"authors\":\"Russell J. Duvernoy\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474466912.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter draws on Deleuze’s distinction between practices of philosophy and science to articulate a philosophical concept of ecology. Because ecology is constitutively concerned with relations between unity and diversity, it is necessarily entangled with metaphysical questions. The chapter uses Félix Guattari’s framework of the three ecologies (psychic, social, and material) and Deleuze and Guattari’s “existential territories” to connect the metaphysical conception of subjectivity from the book’s first half to the idea of psychic ecology. Drawing on Guattari and Jean-Luc Nancy, the chapter explores how what Marx calls “equivalence” exceeds its initial operation as metric of exchange to also function in the production of predictable patterns of subjectivity. Equivalence as a value tacitly orders and constrains attention in manners that make behaviour predictable, making equivalence-prediction two modes of the same logic perpetuating capitalist subjectivity. This diagnosis opens the possibility of counter habits of attention in the service of contributing to the active creation of different futures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affect and Attention After Deleuze and Whitehead\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affect and Attention After Deleuze and Whitehead\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474466912.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affect and Attention After Deleuze and Whitehead","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474466912.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章借鉴德勒兹在哲学实践和科学实践之间的区别来阐明生态学的哲学概念。因为生态学本质上关注的是统一性和多样性之间的关系,它必然与形而上学的问题纠缠在一起。这一章使用了flix Guattari关于三个生态(精神、社会和物质)的框架,以及德勒兹和Guattari的“存在主义领域”,将本书前半部分的形而上学的主体性概念与精神生态的概念联系起来。借助Guattari和Jean-Luc Nancy,本章探讨了马克思所谓的“对等”如何超越其最初作为交换度量的运作,也在可预测的主体性模式的生产中发挥作用。等值作为一种价值,以使行为可预测的方式,默默地命令和约束注意力,使等值-预测成为同一逻辑的两种模式,使资本主义主体性永垂不朽。这种诊断打开了一种可能性,即在积极创造不同未来的服务中,注意的反习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attention, Equivalence and Existential Territories
This chapter draws on Deleuze’s distinction between practices of philosophy and science to articulate a philosophical concept of ecology. Because ecology is constitutively concerned with relations between unity and diversity, it is necessarily entangled with metaphysical questions. The chapter uses Félix Guattari’s framework of the three ecologies (psychic, social, and material) and Deleuze and Guattari’s “existential territories” to connect the metaphysical conception of subjectivity from the book’s first half to the idea of psychic ecology. Drawing on Guattari and Jean-Luc Nancy, the chapter explores how what Marx calls “equivalence” exceeds its initial operation as metric of exchange to also function in the production of predictable patterns of subjectivity. Equivalence as a value tacitly orders and constrains attention in manners that make behaviour predictable, making equivalence-prediction two modes of the same logic perpetuating capitalist subjectivity. This diagnosis opens the possibility of counter habits of attention in the service of contributing to the active creation of different futures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信