可贷资金理论与流动性偏好理论:瓦尔拉斯定律在债券货币生产经济中的有效性

Narciso Túñez Area
{"title":"可贷资金理论与流动性偏好理论:瓦尔拉斯定律在债券货币生产经济中的有效性","authors":"Narciso Túñez Area","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3898040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[enter AbsIn a recent paper Túñez (2016) has reviewed the validity of Walras’Law for a Monetary Exchange Economy using a Non-Compensatory Disequilibrium Framework (NCDF). This paper will apply the same theoretical Framework to a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds to demonstrate that, conflicting with Maurer’s (2009) and Patinkin’s (1965) models, general excess supplies might exist, i.e., Keynes’ thesis of Unemployment Equilibrium is hence a valid theoretical possibility as Walras’ Law does not always hold. The paper will also examine the debate between the loanable funds vs liquidity preference theories using the NCDFtract Body]","PeriodicalId":330048,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loanable Funds theory vs Liquidity Preference theory: The Validity of Walras’ Law in a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds\",\"authors\":\"Narciso Túñez Area\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3898040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[enter AbsIn a recent paper Túñez (2016) has reviewed the validity of Walras’Law for a Monetary Exchange Economy using a Non-Compensatory Disequilibrium Framework (NCDF). This paper will apply the same theoretical Framework to a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds to demonstrate that, conflicting with Maurer’s (2009) and Patinkin’s (1965) models, general excess supplies might exist, i.e., Keynes’ thesis of Unemployment Equilibrium is hence a valid theoretical possibility as Walras’ Law does not always hold. The paper will also examine the debate between the loanable funds vs liquidity preference theories using the NCDFtract Body]\",\"PeriodicalId\":330048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[进入abin]最近的一篇论文Túñez(2016)使用非补偿性非均衡框架(NCDF)审查了瓦尔拉斯定律对货币交换经济的有效性。本文将把相同的理论框架应用于有债券的货币生产经济,以证明,与毛雷尔(2009)和帕廷金(1965)的模型相冲突,一般过剩供应可能存在,即凯恩斯的失业均衡理论因此是一个有效的理论可能性,因为瓦尔拉斯定律并不总是成立。本文还将使用ncdft机构研究可贷款资金与流动性偏好理论之间的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loanable Funds theory vs Liquidity Preference theory: The Validity of Walras’ Law in a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds
[enter AbsIn a recent paper Túñez (2016) has reviewed the validity of Walras’Law for a Monetary Exchange Economy using a Non-Compensatory Disequilibrium Framework (NCDF). This paper will apply the same theoretical Framework to a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds to demonstrate that, conflicting with Maurer’s (2009) and Patinkin’s (1965) models, general excess supplies might exist, i.e., Keynes’ thesis of Unemployment Equilibrium is hence a valid theoretical possibility as Walras’ Law does not always hold. The paper will also examine the debate between the loanable funds vs liquidity preference theories using the NCDFtract Body]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信