{"title":"可贷资金理论与流动性偏好理论:瓦尔拉斯定律在债券货币生产经济中的有效性","authors":"Narciso Túñez Area","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3898040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[enter AbsIn a recent paper Túñez (2016) has reviewed the validity of Walras’Law for a Monetary Exchange Economy using a Non-Compensatory Disequilibrium Framework (NCDF). This paper will apply the same theoretical Framework to a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds to demonstrate that, conflicting with Maurer’s (2009) and Patinkin’s (1965) models, general excess supplies might exist, i.e., Keynes’ thesis of Unemployment Equilibrium is hence a valid theoretical possibility as Walras’ Law does not always hold. The paper will also examine the debate between the loanable funds vs liquidity preference theories using the NCDFtract Body]","PeriodicalId":330048,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loanable Funds theory vs Liquidity Preference theory: The Validity of Walras’ Law in a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds\",\"authors\":\"Narciso Túñez Area\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3898040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[enter AbsIn a recent paper Túñez (2016) has reviewed the validity of Walras’Law for a Monetary Exchange Economy using a Non-Compensatory Disequilibrium Framework (NCDF). This paper will apply the same theoretical Framework to a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds to demonstrate that, conflicting with Maurer’s (2009) and Patinkin’s (1965) models, general excess supplies might exist, i.e., Keynes’ thesis of Unemployment Equilibrium is hence a valid theoretical possibility as Walras’ Law does not always hold. The paper will also examine the debate between the loanable funds vs liquidity preference theories using the NCDFtract Body]\",\"PeriodicalId\":330048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Loanable Funds theory vs Liquidity Preference theory: The Validity of Walras’ Law in a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds
[enter AbsIn a recent paper Túñez (2016) has reviewed the validity of Walras’Law for a Monetary Exchange Economy using a Non-Compensatory Disequilibrium Framework (NCDF). This paper will apply the same theoretical Framework to a Monetary Productive Economy with Bonds to demonstrate that, conflicting with Maurer’s (2009) and Patinkin’s (1965) models, general excess supplies might exist, i.e., Keynes’ thesis of Unemployment Equilibrium is hence a valid theoretical possibility as Walras’ Law does not always hold. The paper will also examine the debate between the loanable funds vs liquidity preference theories using the NCDFtract Body]