正在进行的工作-在高入学率核心科目中采用以学生为中心的“博洛尼亚进程”方法的问题

Alfonso Duran, E. Giraldo, Alicia Duran, M. L. Somacarrera, S. Martín, M. Castro
{"title":"正在进行的工作-在高入学率核心科目中采用以学生为中心的“博洛尼亚进程”方法的问题","authors":"Alfonso Duran, E. Giraldo, Alicia Duran, M. L. Somacarrera, S. Martín, M. Castro","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A major component of the “Bologna process” is shifting the focus from instructor-centered “teaching” to student-centered “active learning”. This change, however, poses an additional burden on the instructor's resources. Besides, the simultaneous redesign of all degrees has allowed universities to exploit synergies. In the Carlos III University, this has led to the creation of horizontal, core subjects that span multiple engineering degrees. The subject analyzed in this paper, Foundations of Engineering Management, spans 7 different engineering degrees. Since this is a core (not elective) subject, this might result in nearly 20 groups being taught each year, from Sep 2009 onwards. Adopting the “Bologna process” student-centric methodologies in such a high-enrollment subject faces significant hurdles in areas such as resources or homogenization. This requires achieving the educational equivalent of the current manufacturing trend towards “mass-customization”, in order to allow individually tailored learning paths with a level of resources similar to that required by standardized education. This paper analyzes the project of designing and preparing for this shift, including the preparatory pilots and the adoption of ITC support tools to facilitate the process.","PeriodicalId":129330,"journal":{"name":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work in progress - issues adopting the “Bologna Process” student-centric methodologies in high enrollment core subjects\",\"authors\":\"Alfonso Duran, E. Giraldo, Alicia Duran, M. L. Somacarrera, S. Martín, M. Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A major component of the “Bologna process” is shifting the focus from instructor-centered “teaching” to student-centered “active learning”. This change, however, poses an additional burden on the instructor's resources. Besides, the simultaneous redesign of all degrees has allowed universities to exploit synergies. In the Carlos III University, this has led to the creation of horizontal, core subjects that span multiple engineering degrees. The subject analyzed in this paper, Foundations of Engineering Management, spans 7 different engineering degrees. Since this is a core (not elective) subject, this might result in nearly 20 groups being taught each year, from Sep 2009 onwards. Adopting the “Bologna process” student-centric methodologies in such a high-enrollment subject faces significant hurdles in areas such as resources or homogenization. This requires achieving the educational equivalent of the current manufacturing trend towards “mass-customization”, in order to allow individually tailored learning paths with a level of resources similar to that required by standardized education. This paper analyzes the project of designing and preparing for this shift, including the preparatory pilots and the adoption of ITC support tools to facilitate the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“博洛尼亚进程”的一个主要组成部分是将重点从以教师为中心的“教学”转向以学生为中心的“主动学习”。然而,这种变化给教师的资源带来了额外的负担。此外,所有学位的同时重新设计使大学能够发挥协同效应。在卡洛斯三世大学,这导致了跨越多个工程学位的横向核心科目的创建。本文所分析的课题《工程管理基础》涵盖了7个不同的工程学位。由于这是一门核心(非选修课)科目,从2009年9月起,每年可能会有近20个小组被教授。在这样一个高入学率的学科中采用以学生为中心的“博洛尼亚进程”方法面临着资源或同质化等方面的重大障碍。这就需要实现与当前制造业“大规模定制”趋势相当的教育,以便允许个性化定制的学习路径,其资源水平与标准化教育所需的资源水平相似。本文分析了这一转变的设计和准备项目,包括准备试点和采用ITC支持工具来促进这一过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Work in progress - issues adopting the “Bologna Process” student-centric methodologies in high enrollment core subjects
A major component of the “Bologna process” is shifting the focus from instructor-centered “teaching” to student-centered “active learning”. This change, however, poses an additional burden on the instructor's resources. Besides, the simultaneous redesign of all degrees has allowed universities to exploit synergies. In the Carlos III University, this has led to the creation of horizontal, core subjects that span multiple engineering degrees. The subject analyzed in this paper, Foundations of Engineering Management, spans 7 different engineering degrees. Since this is a core (not elective) subject, this might result in nearly 20 groups being taught each year, from Sep 2009 onwards. Adopting the “Bologna process” student-centric methodologies in such a high-enrollment subject faces significant hurdles in areas such as resources or homogenization. This requires achieving the educational equivalent of the current manufacturing trend towards “mass-customization”, in order to allow individually tailored learning paths with a level of resources similar to that required by standardized education. This paper analyzes the project of designing and preparing for this shift, including the preparatory pilots and the adoption of ITC support tools to facilitate the process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信