间歇性地西泮预防热性惊厥。利与弊。

F U Knudsen
{"title":"间歇性地西泮预防热性惊厥。利与弊。","authors":"F U Knudsen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major cohort studies document that the long-term prognosis for most children with febrile convulsions (FC) is excellent. The 2 main treatment alternatives so far have been long-term prophylaxis with phenobarbital or valproate or no prophylaxis at all. Phenobarbital at times of fever is ineffective and obsolete. Consensus has emerged that long-term prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs is rarely justified in FC considering the side effects and the favourable prognosis. No treatment at all does not appear quite satisfactory either, as FC have a high recurrence rate, disrupt family life and may have emotional consequences for the family. Moreover, all FC children face a risk, although admittedly low, of subsequent long-lasting potentially central nervous system (CNS)-damaging seizures. However, 2 further options exist: treatment with rapid-acting benzodiazepines solely at times of greatest risk, i.e., at high fever or at renewed seizures. Several clinical trials have confirmed that intermittent diazepam prophylaxis by way of a few doses of the drug per year provides effective seizure control and reduces the recurrence rate by one half or two thirds. The treatment is feasible and cheap, well tolerated by the child and well accepted by the parents. Compliance problems are common and only partly abatable. Trivial side effects are frequent. Transient respiratory apnoea does occur, but 15 years' experience substantiates that serious side effects are remarkably rare. Acute anticonvulsant treatment with rectal diazepam in solution given by the parents to stop ongoing seizures and to prevent immediate recurrences is an attractive alternative. It is feasible, is probably effective and minimizes the use of drugs, but compliance problems are common and protracted seizures are not always controlled. The subsequent management should include a risk profile approach considering a combination of risk factors for new FC rather than a single factor. By means of a risk index, based on simple clinical data including age at onset, family seizure history, seizure type and frequency of fever, children may be identified as being at low, intermediate or high risk for further febrile fits. However, risk factors for new FC and not for subsequent epilepsy should be used. It is concluded that preventing or abbreviating new FC with benzodiazepines appears to be a useful, although not ideal, drug-minimizing approach in managing many children with simple or complex FC. From a health hazard viewpoint, treatment is not strictly mandatory, although advisable. A selective strategy seems rational. Intermittent diazepam prophylaxis may preferably be offered to children at high risk for new FC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":75395,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"135 ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intermittent diazepam prophylaxis in febrile convulsions. Pros and cons.\",\"authors\":\"F U Knudsen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Major cohort studies document that the long-term prognosis for most children with febrile convulsions (FC) is excellent. The 2 main treatment alternatives so far have been long-term prophylaxis with phenobarbital or valproate or no prophylaxis at all. Phenobarbital at times of fever is ineffective and obsolete. Consensus has emerged that long-term prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs is rarely justified in FC considering the side effects and the favourable prognosis. No treatment at all does not appear quite satisfactory either, as FC have a high recurrence rate, disrupt family life and may have emotional consequences for the family. Moreover, all FC children face a risk, although admittedly low, of subsequent long-lasting potentially central nervous system (CNS)-damaging seizures. However, 2 further options exist: treatment with rapid-acting benzodiazepines solely at times of greatest risk, i.e., at high fever or at renewed seizures. Several clinical trials have confirmed that intermittent diazepam prophylaxis by way of a few doses of the drug per year provides effective seizure control and reduces the recurrence rate by one half or two thirds. The treatment is feasible and cheap, well tolerated by the child and well accepted by the parents. Compliance problems are common and only partly abatable. Trivial side effects are frequent. Transient respiratory apnoea does occur, but 15 years' experience substantiates that serious side effects are remarkably rare. Acute anticonvulsant treatment with rectal diazepam in solution given by the parents to stop ongoing seizures and to prevent immediate recurrences is an attractive alternative. It is feasible, is probably effective and minimizes the use of drugs, but compliance problems are common and protracted seizures are not always controlled. The subsequent management should include a risk profile approach considering a combination of risk factors for new FC rather than a single factor. By means of a risk index, based on simple clinical data including age at onset, family seizure history, seizure type and frequency of fever, children may be identified as being at low, intermediate or high risk for further febrile fits. However, risk factors for new FC and not for subsequent epilepsy should be used. It is concluded that preventing or abbreviating new FC with benzodiazepines appears to be a useful, although not ideal, drug-minimizing approach in managing many children with simple or complex FC. From a health hazard viewpoint, treatment is not strictly mandatory, although advisable. A selective strategy seems rational. Intermittent diazepam prophylaxis may preferably be offered to children at high risk for new FC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主要队列研究表明,大多数儿童热性惊厥(FC)的长期预后良好。到目前为止,两种主要的治疗选择是苯巴比妥或丙戊酸盐的长期预防或根本不进行预防。发烧时使用苯巴比妥是无效和过时的。考虑到副作用和良好的预后,FC患者很少有理由长期使用抗癫痫药物进行预防。完全不治疗似乎也不太令人满意,因为FC复发率高,扰乱家庭生活,并可能对家庭造成情感后果。此外,所有FC儿童都面临着继发的长期潜在中枢神经系统(CNS)损伤性癫痫发作的风险,尽管公认风险较低。然而,存在另外两种选择:仅在风险最大的时候,即在高烧或再次发作时,使用速效苯二氮卓类药物进行治疗。几项临床试验证实,通过每年服用几剂地西泮进行间歇性预防,可以有效地控制癫痫发作,并将复发率降低一半或三分之二。这种治疗方法既可行又便宜,孩子能很好地接受,家长也能很好地接受。遵从性问题很常见,而且只能部分缓解。轻微的副作用是常见的。短暂性呼吸暂停确实会发生,但15年的经验证明,严重的副作用非常罕见。急性抗惊厥治疗与直肠地西泮溶液给予父母停止持续发作和防止立即复发是一个有吸引力的选择。这是可行的,可能是有效的,并尽量减少药物的使用,但依从性问题是常见的,长期癫痫发作并不总是得到控制。后续管理应包括考虑新FC风险因素组合而不是单一因素的风险概况方法。通过风险指数,根据简单的临床数据,包括发病年龄、家族史、发作类型和发热频率,可以确定儿童处于低热、中度或高风险。然而,应该使用新发FC而非继发癫痫的危险因素。结论是,用苯二氮卓类药物预防或缩短新的FC似乎是一种有用的,尽管不是理想的,药物最小化的方法来管理许多患有简单或复杂FC的儿童。从危害健康的角度来看,虽然建议治疗,但不是严格强制的。选择性策略似乎是合理的。间断性地西泮预防可能最好提供给新FC高风险的儿童。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intermittent diazepam prophylaxis in febrile convulsions. Pros and cons.

Major cohort studies document that the long-term prognosis for most children with febrile convulsions (FC) is excellent. The 2 main treatment alternatives so far have been long-term prophylaxis with phenobarbital or valproate or no prophylaxis at all. Phenobarbital at times of fever is ineffective and obsolete. Consensus has emerged that long-term prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs is rarely justified in FC considering the side effects and the favourable prognosis. No treatment at all does not appear quite satisfactory either, as FC have a high recurrence rate, disrupt family life and may have emotional consequences for the family. Moreover, all FC children face a risk, although admittedly low, of subsequent long-lasting potentially central nervous system (CNS)-damaging seizures. However, 2 further options exist: treatment with rapid-acting benzodiazepines solely at times of greatest risk, i.e., at high fever or at renewed seizures. Several clinical trials have confirmed that intermittent diazepam prophylaxis by way of a few doses of the drug per year provides effective seizure control and reduces the recurrence rate by one half or two thirds. The treatment is feasible and cheap, well tolerated by the child and well accepted by the parents. Compliance problems are common and only partly abatable. Trivial side effects are frequent. Transient respiratory apnoea does occur, but 15 years' experience substantiates that serious side effects are remarkably rare. Acute anticonvulsant treatment with rectal diazepam in solution given by the parents to stop ongoing seizures and to prevent immediate recurrences is an attractive alternative. It is feasible, is probably effective and minimizes the use of drugs, but compliance problems are common and protracted seizures are not always controlled. The subsequent management should include a risk profile approach considering a combination of risk factors for new FC rather than a single factor. By means of a risk index, based on simple clinical data including age at onset, family seizure history, seizure type and frequency of fever, children may be identified as being at low, intermediate or high risk for further febrile fits. However, risk factors for new FC and not for subsequent epilepsy should be used. It is concluded that preventing or abbreviating new FC with benzodiazepines appears to be a useful, although not ideal, drug-minimizing approach in managing many children with simple or complex FC. From a health hazard viewpoint, treatment is not strictly mandatory, although advisable. A selective strategy seems rational. Intermittent diazepam prophylaxis may preferably be offered to children at high risk for new FC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信